RFCI vs. EQL
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL).
RFCI and EQL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFCI is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. EQL is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the NYSE Select Sector Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2009.
Performance
RFCI vs. EQL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFCI vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | -0.21% | 6.85% | 2.64% | 5.97% | -9.27% | -1.48% | 6.48% | 8.69% | -1.30% | 3.14% |
EQL Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF | 2.94% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.87% | -10.72% | 29.32% | 10.87% | 27.87% | -6.12% | 18.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFCI achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than EQL's 2.94% return.
RFCI
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
EQL
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 15.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFCI vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than EQL's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFCI vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank
RFCI
EQL
RFCI vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFCI | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.03 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.50 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.36 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 6.74 | -1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFCI | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.03 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.73 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.83 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCI and EQL is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RFCI vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison
RFCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than EQL's 1.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 4.51% | 4.55% | 4.30% | 3.55% | 2.26% | 3.45% | 2.04% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 0.00% |
EQL Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.71% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
RFCI vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCI drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCI and EQL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCI | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -35.65% | +21.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -11.90% | +9.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.46% | -19.24% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -4.49% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -3.28% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 2.40% | -1.59% |
Volatility
RFCI vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) is 1.54%, while Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that RFCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFCI | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 3.95% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 7.32% | -4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 14.88% | -10.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 14.60% | -9.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 16.55% | -11.59% |