SDOG vs. REZ
SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and REZ (iShares Residential Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while REZ is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE NAREIT All Residential Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDOG returned 9.99%/yr vs 7.05%/yr for REZ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDOG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for REZ.
Performance
SDOG vs. REZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than REZ's 12.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOG has outperformed REZ with an annualized return of 9.99%, while REZ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.05% annualized return.
SDOG
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 26.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
REZ
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- 1Y
- 13.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.92%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
SDOG vs. REZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.13% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
REZ iShares Residential Real Estate ETF | 12.29% | 4.80% | 12.73% | 10.97% | -28.31% | 47.86% | -6.62% | 24.49% | 3.89% | 3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and REZ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012 | 0.49 |
The correlation between SDOG and REZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDOG vs. REZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOG
REZ
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDOG
REZ
-
Technology
SDOG
REZ
-
Financial Services
SDOG
REZ
Energy
SDOG
REZ
-
Consumer Defensive
SDOG
REZ
-
Healthcare
SDOG
REZ
-
Utilities
SDOG
REZ
-
Communication Services
SDOG
REZ
-
Industrials
SDOG
REZ
-
Basic Materials
SDOG
REZ
-
Real Estate
SDOG
-
REZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. REZ — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
REZ
SDOG vs. REZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDOG | REZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.17 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 1.60 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 4.86 | +8.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. REZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum REZ drawdown of -66.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and REZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | REZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -66.87% | +23.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -8.76% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -18.39% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -35.05% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | -44.15% | +0.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -12.67% | +7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.87% | -0.93% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. REZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) is 3.34%, while iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that SDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | REZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 5.69% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.02% | 11.14% | -3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 14.73% | -3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 18.97% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 21.55% | -2.49% |
SDOG vs. REZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than REZ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOG vs. REZ - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than REZ's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REZ iShares Residential Real Estate ETF | 2.05% | 2.74% | 2.26% | 2.94% | 3.37% | 1.81% | 3.17% | 2.90% | 3.63% | 3.57% | 5.55% | 3.18% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.26% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOG and REZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REZ has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to SDOG (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs REZ's -66.87%.
On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.99% vs 7.05% for REZ. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.99% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for REZ.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.05% for REZ.
SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while REZ is REIT. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while REZ tracks FTSE NAREIT All Residential Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.48% for REZ.
SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOG and REZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer