REZ vs. NURE
REZ (iShares Residential Real Estate ETF) and NURE (Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - REZ tracks the FTSE NAREIT All Residential Capped Index while NURE tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REZ returned 3.90%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for NURE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REZ charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NURE.
Performance
REZ vs. NURE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REZ achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than NURE's 13.97% return.
REZ
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.90%
- 10Y*
- 6.61%
NURE
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 10.76%
- 3Y*
- 6.97%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- —
REZ vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REZ iShares Residential Real Estate ETF | 9.54% | 4.80% | 12.73% | 10.97% | -28.31% | 47.86% | -6.62% | 24.49% | 3.89% | 3.87% |
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 13.97% | -7.51% | 6.65% | 13.09% | -28.48% | 53.41% | -7.24% | 25.10% | 0.02% | 8.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between REZ and NURE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016 | 0.86 |
The correlation between REZ and NURE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REZ vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank
REZ
NURE
REZ vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REZ | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.12 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.18 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 2.46 | +1.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REZ vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REZ drawdown since its inception was -66.87%, which is greater than NURE's maximum drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REZ and NURE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REZ | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.87% | -46.05% | -20.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -9.13% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | -21.03% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -35.98% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -10.14% | +7.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.66% | -12.28% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 4.38% | -1.49% |
Volatility
REZ vs. NURE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) at 4.24%. This indicates that REZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REZ | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 4.24% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 11.62% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.99% | 16.04% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 19.67% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 21.78% | -0.21% |
REZ vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison
REZ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
REZ vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison
REZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than NURE's 4.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 4.36% | 4.56% | 3.51% | 3.73% | 2.80% | 1.34% | 3.41% | 3.28% | 4.11% | 3.86% | 0.48% | 0.00% |
REZ iShares Residential Real Estate ETF | 2.10% | 2.74% | 2.26% | 2.94% | 3.37% | 1.81% | 3.17% | 2.90% | 3.63% | 3.57% | 5.55% | 3.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REZ and NURE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REZ has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to NURE (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REZ dropped -66.87% vs NURE's -46.05%.
On 5-year performance, REZ leads with 3.90% vs 1.57% for NURE. On fees, NURE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NURE has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, REZ has performed better with a 3.90% return vs 1.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NURE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for REZ.
NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 2.10% for REZ.
REZ tracks FTSE NAREIT All Residential Capped Index, while NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for REZ and 0.35% for NURE.
REZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REZ and NURE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer