PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDOG vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDOG vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly higher than IDOG's 10.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOG has underperformed IDOG with an annualized return of 9.96%, while IDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.


SDOG

1D
0.47%
1M
1.24%
YTD
14.96%
6M
14.84%
1Y
24.50%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
9.96%

IDOG

1D
-0.39%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
10.07%
6M
10.27%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
11.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDOG vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.96%11.12%14.70%4.19%-0.20%24.59%-0.35%24.02%-11.43%12.65%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
10.07%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SDOG and IDOG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2013

0.69

The correlation between SDOG and IDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDOG vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDOG
IDOG

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
9.6%

Technology

16.2%
9.1%

Financial Services

10.6%
11.3%

Healthcare

9.8%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
9.1%

Utilities

9.2%
9.6%

Energy

9.1%
10.1%

Communication Services

8.4%
9.8%

Industrials

7.5%
12.2%

Basic Materials

3.5%
10.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

SDOG
16.3%
IDOG
9.6%

Technology

SDOG
16.2%
IDOG
9.1%

Financial Services

SDOG
10.6%
IDOG
11.3%

Healthcare

SDOG
9.8%
IDOG
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

SDOG
9.5%
IDOG
9.1%

Utilities

SDOG
9.2%
IDOG
9.6%

Energy

SDOG
9.1%
IDOG
10.1%

Communication Services

SDOG
8.4%
IDOG
9.8%

Industrials

SDOG
7.5%
IDOG
12.2%

Basic Materials

SDOG
3.5%
IDOG
10.2%

Real Estate

SDOG

-

IDOG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDOG vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDOG
SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDOG vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDOGIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

4.72

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.53

15.97

-3.43

SDOG vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDOG and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDOG vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDOGIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-37.32%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-6.47%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.00%

-13.92%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.84%

-25.31%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.56%

-37.32%

-6.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-4.45%

+2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-7.90%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.91%

+0.05%

Volatility

SDOG vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) is 3.71%, while ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that SDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDOGIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

4.87%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

10.94%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.60%

13.89%

-2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.37%

15.69%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

17.18%

+1.84%

SDOG vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDOG vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than IDOG's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.47%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.49%3.68%3.86%4.29%3.87%3.62%3.63%3.37%4.03%3.27%3.32%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDOG and IDOG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDOG has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to SDOG (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, IDOG leads with 11.26% vs 9.96% for SDOG. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 11.26% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 3.49% for SDOG.

SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IDOG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDOG and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer