SDOG vs. DIVB
SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while DIVB is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDOG returned 10.43%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for DIVB. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDOG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.
Performance
SDOG vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 22.13% return.
SDOG
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 24.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
DIVB
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 19.39%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- —
SDOG vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 18.72% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 5.03% |
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 22.13% | 15.09% | 18.59% | 13.27% | -10.51% | 31.29% | 10.78% | 32.72% | -8.16% | 5.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and DIVB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SDOG and DIVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
DIVB
SDOG vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDOG | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 4.30 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.44 | 14.43 | -1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than DIVB's maximum drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and DIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -36.93% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -6.82% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -15.45% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -21.08% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -4.94% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.03% | -0.09% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) have volatilities of 3.94% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 3.92% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 9.02% | -0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 11.90% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 15.30% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 18.34% | +0.62% |
SDOG vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOG vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than DIVB's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 2.17% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.52% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.38% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOG and DIVB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDOG has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to DIVB (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs DIVB's -36.93%.
On 5-year performance, DIVB leads with 12.91% vs 10.43% for SDOG. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 2.17% for DIVB.
SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVB is Dividend. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.05% for DIVB.
DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOG and DIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer