SDMF vs. KMLM
SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) and KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds - SDMF tracks the DBi CTA Managed Futures Index while KMLM tracks the KFA MLM Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDMF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for KMLM.
Performance
SDMF vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SDMF
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMLM
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- 6.97%
- 6M
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- 12.95%
- 3Y*
- -0.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- —
SDMF vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.56% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDMF and KMLM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDMF vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
SDMF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KMLM
SDMF vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDMF | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDMF vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDMF drawdown since its inception was -6.23%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMF and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDMF | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -27.47% | +21.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -16.59% | +13.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -12.76% | +10.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.37% | — |
Volatility
SDMF vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDMF | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 11.39% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 14.57% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 14.69% | -1.53% |
SDMF vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDMF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDMF vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.70% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDMF and KMLM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.
KMLM has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.
SDMF tracks DBi CTA Managed Futures Index, while KMLM tracks KFA MLM Index. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDMF and 0.90% for KMLM.
Find the right allocation for SDMF and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer