PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDIV vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDIV vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SDIV having a 8.49% return and XYLD slightly higher at 8.63%. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of -0.29%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.27% annualized return.


SDIV

1D
0.28%
1M
2.38%
6M
1.25%
YTD
8.49%
1Y
19.40%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*
-0.29%
ALL TIME*
1.26%

XYLD

1D
0.53%
1M
2.36%
6M
6.99%
YTD
8.63%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
8.27%
ALL TIME*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.65M$8.97M$10.68M
$33.43M$34.54M$32.48M

SDIV vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
8.49%29.12%1.77%5.46%-26.43%3.76%-20.89%13.04%-15.07%11.95%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
8.63%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and XYLD is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013

0.58

The correlation between SDIV and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDIV vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDIV
XYLD

Real Estate

33.0%
1.8%

Financial Services

15.5%
11.6%

Energy

13.3%
3.0%

Industrials

10.4%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
9.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.3%
9.9%

Technology

2.8%
38.5%

Utilities

1.0%
2.2%

Healthcare

0.9%
8.9%

Real Estate

SDIV
33.0%
XYLD
1.8%

Financial Services

SDIV
15.5%
XYLD
11.6%

Energy

SDIV
13.3%
XYLD
3.0%

Industrials

SDIV
10.4%
XYLD
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SDIV
5.3%
XYLD
9.5%

Basic Materials

SDIV
3.7%
XYLD
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

SDIV
3.6%
XYLD
4.5%

Communication Services

SDIV
3.3%
XYLD
9.9%

Technology

SDIV
2.8%
XYLD
38.5%

Utilities

SDIV
1.0%
XYLD
2.2%

Healthcare

SDIV
0.9%
XYLD
8.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDIV vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDIV
SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDIV vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDIVXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.63

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

3.71

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

19.28

-11.98

SDIV vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDIVXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-33.46%

-23.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-5.29%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-15.53%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.69%

-18.66%

-20.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.90%

-33.46%

-23.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.82%

0.00%

-15.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.57%

-3.68%

-14.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

1.02%

+1.65%

Volatility

SDIV vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.97%. This indicates that SDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDIVXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

1.97%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

5.99%

+3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

7.10%

+5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

11.27%

+5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

14.16%

+4.72%

SDIV vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDIV vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, less than XYLD's 10.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
9.05%9.59%11.33%11.73%14.17%8.95%7.96%8.73%9.22%6.66%6.95%7.33%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.47%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDIV and XYLD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDIV has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to XYLD (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 10-year performance, XYLD leads with 8.27% vs -0.29% for SDIV. On fees, SDIV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 8.27% return vs -0.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDIV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.47%, compared with 9.05% for SDIV.

SDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDIV and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer