PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDIV vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDIV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIV achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 18.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -0.29%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.


SDIV

1D
0.00%
1M
2.38%
6M
0.08%
YTD
8.49%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
-0.29%
ALL TIME*
1.26%

QQQ

1D
3.40%
1M
1.58%
6M
17.69%
YTD
18.11%
1Y
28.94%
3Y*
25.56%
5Y*
15.07%
10Y*
20.86%
ALL TIME*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.34B$28.86B$31.95B
$9.04M$9.56M$10.89M

SDIV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
8.49%29.12%1.77%5.46%-26.43%3.76%-20.89%13.04%-15.07%11.95%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
18.11%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and QQQ is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.58

The correlation between SDIV and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDIV vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDIV
QQQ

Real Estate

33.0%
0.1%

Financial Services

15.5%
0.2%

Energy

13.3%
0.5%

Industrials

10.4%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
10.7%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
6.3%

Communication Services

3.3%
13.1%

Technology

2.8%
60.9%

Utilities

1.0%
1.1%

Healthcare

0.9%
3.6%

Real Estate

SDIV
33.0%
QQQ
0.1%

Financial Services

SDIV
15.5%
QQQ
0.2%

Energy

SDIV
13.3%
QQQ
0.5%

Industrials

SDIV
10.4%
QQQ
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SDIV
5.3%
QQQ
10.7%

Basic Materials

SDIV
3.7%
QQQ
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

SDIV
3.6%
QQQ
6.3%

Communication Services

SDIV
3.3%
QQQ
13.1%

Technology

SDIV
2.8%
QQQ
60.9%

Utilities

SDIV
1.0%
QQQ
1.1%

Healthcare

SDIV
0.9%
QQQ
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDIV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDIV
SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDIV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDIVQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.43

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.01

7.72

-0.71

SDIV vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDIVQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-82.97%

+26.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-11.96%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-22.77%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.69%

-35.12%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.90%

-35.12%

-21.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.82%

-2.88%

-12.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.57%

-32.61%

+14.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.76%

-1.09%

Volatility

SDIV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) is 2.61%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that SDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDIVQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

7.63%

-5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

16.43%

-6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

19.61%

-7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

22.97%

-6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

22.54%

-3.66%

SDIV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDIV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than QQQ's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.42%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
9.05%9.59%11.33%11.73%14.17%8.95%7.96%8.73%9.22%6.66%6.95%7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDIV and QQQ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to SDIV (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.86% vs -0.29% for SDIV. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.86% return vs -0.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SDIV.

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 9.05%, compared with 0.42% for QQQ.

SDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.18% for QQQ.

SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDIV and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer