PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDIV vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDIV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIV achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 10.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of -0.19%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.65% annualized return.


SDIV

1D
-1.05%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
5.89%
6M
6.86%
1Y
24.40%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
-0.86%
10Y*
-0.19%

VYM

1D
-1.35%
1M
0.82%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.34%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDIV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
5.89%29.12%1.77%5.46%-26.43%3.76%-20.89%13.04%-15.07%11.95%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
10.90%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and VYM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011

0.75

The correlation between SDIV and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDIV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDIV
VYM

Real Estate

36.2%
0.0%

Energy

18.4%
9.8%

Industrials

14.3%
12.1%

Financial Services

8.9%
20.5%

Communication Services

6.1%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
8.1%

Basic Materials

2.8%
3.5%

Technology

1.6%
17.7%

Healthcare

1.4%
12.2%

Utilities

1.1%
5.7%

Real Estate

SDIV
36.2%
VYM
0.0%

Energy

SDIV
18.4%
VYM
9.8%

Industrials

SDIV
14.3%
VYM
12.1%

Financial Services

SDIV
8.9%
VYM
20.5%

Communication Services

SDIV
6.1%
VYM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SDIV
5.5%
VYM
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

SDIV
3.7%
VYM
8.1%

Basic Materials

SDIV
2.8%
VYM
3.5%

Technology

SDIV
1.6%
VYM
17.7%

Healthcare

SDIV
1.4%
VYM
12.2%

Utilities

SDIV
1.1%
VYM
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDIV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDIV
SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDIV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDIVVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.44

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.78

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

14.19

-2.38

SDIV vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDIVVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.45

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.80

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

0.72

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.51

-0.45

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDIVVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-56.98%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-6.69%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-14.46%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.94%

-15.84%

-26.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.90%

-35.21%

-21.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.84%

-1.82%

-16.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-7.19%

-11.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.78%

+0.29%

Volatility

SDIV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.08%. This indicates that SDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDIVVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

3.08%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

7.73%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

10.35%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

13.97%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

16.34%

+2.63%

SDIV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDIV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.24%, more than VYM's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
9.24%9.59%11.33%11.73%14.17%8.95%7.96%8.73%9.22%6.66%6.95%7.33%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.22%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDIV and VYM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDIV has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to VYM (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.65% vs -0.19% for SDIV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.65% return vs -0.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SDIV.

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 9.24%, compared with 2.22% for VYM.

SDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while VYM is Dividend. SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDIV and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer