SDIV vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SDIV (Global X SuperDividend ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. SDIV is passively managed, while WBIF is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDIV returned -0.07%/yr vs 5.52%/yr for WBIF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDIV charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

SDIV vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIV achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly lower than WBIF's 11.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed WBIF with an annualized return of -0.07%, while WBIF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.52% annualized return.

SDIV

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: -3.86%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 6M: 6.19%
• 1Y: 25.09%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: -0.84%
• 10Y*: -0.07%

WBIF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 11.61%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 23.01%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: 5.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDIV vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	5.97%	29.12%	1.77%	5.46%	-26.43%	3.76%	-20.89%	13.04%	-15.07%	11.95%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	11.61%	9.16%	3.43%	0.49%	-8.38%	16.56%	-2.71%	2.68%	-4.68%	19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and WBIF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014	0.58

The correlation between SDIV and WBIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDIV vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDIV	WBIF
Real Estate	36.2%	-
Energy	18.4%	2.9%
Industrials	14.3%	14.6%
Financial Services	8.9%	31.0%
Communication Services	6.1%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.5%	11.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	3.1%
Basic Materials	2.8%	1.0%
Technology	1.6%	19.9%
Healthcare	1.4%	3.4%
Utilities	1.1%	10.3%

Return for Risk

SDIV vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDIV

SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 61
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 62
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDIV vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDIV	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.88	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	2.73	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.34	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	3.50	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.41	12.53	-0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDIV vs. WBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the WBIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and WBIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDIV	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.88	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	0.19	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00	0.45	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.30	-0.24

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than WBIF's maximum drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDIV	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.90%	-20.29%	-36.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.35%	-6.60%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.64%	-17.16%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.94%	-20.29%	-21.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.90%	-20.29%	-36.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.77%	-0.97%	-16.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.59%	-7.74%	-10.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.84%	+0.19%

Volatility

SDIV vs. WBIF - Volatility Comparison

Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDIV	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.21%	4.13%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.64%	8.63%	+1.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	12.31%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.86%	12.86%	+4.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.97%	12.34%	+6.63%

SDIV vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDIV vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.02%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	10.02%	9.59%	11.33%	11.73%	14.17%	8.95%	7.96%	8.73%	9.22%	6.66%	6.95%	7.33%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDIV and WBIF in my portfolio?

SDIV and WBIF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDIV or WBIF?

SDIV has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to WBIF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs WBIF's -20.29%.

Which ETF is better, SDIV or WBIF?

On 10-year performance, WBIF leads with 5.52% vs -0.07% for SDIV. On fees, SDIV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SDIV or WBIF?

Over the 10-year period, WBIF has performed better with a 5.52% return vs -0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDIV or WBIF?

SDIV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDIV or WBIF?

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 10.02%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between SDIV and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 1.25% for WBIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.