SDIV vs. URA

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SDIV (Global X SuperDividend ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDIV returned -0.29%/yr vs 15.21%/yr for URA. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SDIV charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.

Performance

SDIV vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIV achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly higher than URA's -4.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed URA with an annualized return of -0.29%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.21% annualized return.

SDIV

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.38%
• 6M: 1.25%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 1Y: 19.40%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: 1.38%
• 10Y*: -0.29%
• ALL TIME*: 1.26%

URA

• 1D: 4.45%
• 1M: -5.60%
• 6M: -23.39%
• YTD: -4.49%
• 1Y: 11.87%
• 3Y*: 27.86%
• 5Y*: 20.93%
• 10Y*: 15.21%
• ALL TIME*: -3.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	$7.65M	$8.97M	$10.68M
URA Global X Uranium ETF	$125.37M	$115.54M	$169.15M

SDIV vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	8.49%	29.12%	1.77%	5.46%	-26.43%	3.76%	-20.89%	13.04%	-15.07%	11.95%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	-4.49%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-11.32%	57.57%	41.33%	-3.54%	-22.11%	19.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and URA is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011	0.55

The correlation between SDIV and URA shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDIV vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDIV	URA
Real Estate	33.0%	-
Financial Services	15.5%	-
Energy	13.3%	58.7%
Industrials	10.4%	21.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	-
Basic Materials	3.7%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	-
Communication Services	3.3%	-
Technology	2.8%	0.9%
Utilities	1.0%	7.1%
Healthcare	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

SDIV vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDIV

SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 66
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 18
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 19
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDIV vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDIV	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	0.23	+1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	0.71	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.08	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	0.30	+2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	0.65	+6.64

SDIV vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDIV	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.90%	-93.54%	+36.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.35%	-39.30%	+31.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.64%	-39.30%	+20.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.69%	-39.30%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.90%	-61.45%	+4.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.82%	-53.69%	+37.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.57%	-74.74%	+56.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	18.23%	-15.56%

Volatility

SDIV vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) is 2.62%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 14.37%. This indicates that SDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDIV	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	14.37%	-11.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	37.93%	-28.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.26%	52.40%	-40.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	44.16%	-27.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.88%	38.14%	-19.26%

SDIV vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDIV vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than URA's 5.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	9.05%	9.59%	11.33%	11.73%	14.17%	8.95%	7.96%	8.73%	9.22%	6.66%	6.95%	7.33%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	5.11%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDIV and URA in my portfolio?

SDIV and URA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDIV or URA?

URA has higher volatility (14.37%) compared to SDIV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs URA's -93.54%.

Which ETF is better, SDIV or URA?

On 10-year performance, URA leads with 15.21% vs -0.29% for SDIV. On fees, SDIV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SDIV or URA?

Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 15.21% return vs -0.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDIV or URA?

SDIV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDIV or URA?

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 9.05%, compared with 5.11% for URA.

What is the main difference between SDIV and URA?

SDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while URA is Uranium. SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.69% for URA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.