SDFI vs. CRWG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SDFI (AB Short Duration Income ETF) and CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDFI is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Actively Managed, while CRWG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. SDFI is passively managed, while CRWG is actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDFI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRWG.

Performance

SDFI vs. CRWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Short Duration Income ETF (SDFI) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDFI achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than CRWG's 34.43% return.

SDFI

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.89%
• 6M: 1.13%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRWG

• 1D: -9.65%
• 1M: -6.23%
• YTD: 34.43%
• 6M: 5.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDFI vs. CRWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SDFI AB Short Duration Income ETF	0.89%	2.13%
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	34.43%	-81.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SDFI and CRWG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025	0.02

Return for Risk

SDFI vs. CRWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDFI

SDFI Risk / Return Rank: 71
SDFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SDFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SDFI Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SDFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SDFI Martin Ratio Rank: 77

CRWG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDFI vs. CRWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Short Duration Income ETF (SDFI) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDFI	CRWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.25	—	—

Drawdowns

SDFI vs. CRWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDFI drawdown since its inception was -1.21%, smaller than the maximum CRWG drawdown of -89.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDFI and CRWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDFI	CRWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.21%	-89.42%	+88.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-79.92%	+79.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-68.87%	+68.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SDFI	CRWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05%	189.35%	-187.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.48%	189.35%	-186.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.48%	189.35%	-186.87%

SDFI vs. CRWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDFI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CRWG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDFI vs. CRWG - Dividend Comparison

SDFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, less than CRWG's 5.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	5.50%	7.39%	0.00%
SDFI AB Short Duration Income ETF	4.61%	4.66%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDFI and CRWG in my portfolio?

SDFI and CRWG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SDFI or CRWG?

On fees, SDFI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDFI or CRWG?

SDFI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CRWG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDFI or CRWG?

CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 4.61% for SDFI.

What is the main difference between SDFI and CRWG?

SDFI is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CRWG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SDFI and 0.75% for CRWG.