SDEM vs. SIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SDEM (Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDEM returned 4.84%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for SIL. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDEM charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.

Performance

SDEM vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SDEM has underperformed SIL with an annualized return of 4.84%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.

SDEM

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 6M: 10.30%
• 1Y: 30.03%
• 3Y*: 19.61%
• 5Y*: 4.14%
• 10Y*: 4.84%

SIL

• 1D: -4.96%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 15.66%
• 1Y: 91.23%
• 3Y*: 49.15%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 10.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDEM vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	10.35%	32.01%	4.02%	12.64%	-21.53%	2.11%	-11.13%	17.56%	-17.40%	16.57%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	4.75%	166.16%	14.62%	1.31%	-22.83%	-18.35%	40.30%	34.78%	-22.42%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SDEM and SIL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2015	0.38

The correlation between SDEM and SIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDEM vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDEM	SIL
Financial Services	24.2%	-
Industrials	12.9%	-
Utilities	7.9%	-
Communication Services	5.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	0.2%
Technology	5.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.5%	-
Energy	5.1%	-
Real Estate	3.2%	-
Healthcare	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	99.8%

Return for Risk

SDEM vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDEM

SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 65
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 48
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDEM vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDEM	SIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.83	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.17	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.30	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	2.79	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.64	7.14	+4.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDEM vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDEM and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDEM	SIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	1.83	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.36	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.27	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.14	+0.05

Drawdowns

SDEM vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and SIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDEM	SIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.38%	-82.99%	+35.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	-32.91%	+23.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.34%	-32.91%	+20.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.70%	-55.08%	+18.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.38%	-63.04%	+15.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.20%	-25.87%	+21.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.71%	-51.45%	+30.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	12.82%	-10.23%

Volatility

SDEM vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) is 4.90%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that SDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDEM	SIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	17.66%	-12.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.14%	41.57%	-30.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	50.01%	-36.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.43%	39.21%	-21.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.22%	39.60%	-20.38%

SDEM vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDEM vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, more than SIL's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	5.42%	5.27%	7.28%	7.50%	8.86%	8.14%	6.30%	6.47%	6.55%	5.01%	5.06%	6.14%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.13%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDEM and SIL in my portfolio?

SDEM and SIL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDEM or SIL?

SIL has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to SDEM (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs SIL's -82.99%.

Which ETF is better, SDEM or SIL?

On 10-year performance, SIL leads with 10.69% vs 4.84% for SDEM. On fees, SIL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SDEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SDEM or SIL?

Over the 10-year period, SIL has performed better with a 10.69% return vs 4.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDEM or SIL?

SIL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDEM or SIL?

SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 5.42%, compared with 1.13% for SIL.

What is the main difference between SDEM and SIL?

SDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SIL is Silver. SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.65% for SIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.