SDEM vs. SCHE
SDEM (Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF) and SCHE (Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - SDEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend while SCHE tracks the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDEM returned 4.04%/yr vs 7.95%/yr for SCHE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDEM charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SCHE.
Performance
SDEM vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than SCHE's 9.54% return. Over the past 10 years, SDEM has underperformed SCHE with an annualized return of 4.04%, while SCHE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.95% annualized return.
SDEM
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 1Y
- 25.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 4.04%
SCHE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
SDEM vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 10.92% | 32.01% | 4.02% | 12.64% | -21.53% | 2.11% | -11.13% | 17.56% | -17.40% | 16.57% |
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 9.54% | 26.54% | 10.60% | 8.93% | -17.84% | -0.65% | 14.49% | 20.31% | -13.57% | 32.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDEM and SCHE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SDEM and SCHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SDEM vs. SCHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDEM
SCHE
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
SDEM
SCHE
Industrials
SDEM
SCHE
Real Estate
SDEM
SCHE
Utilities
SDEM
SCHE
Consumer Defensive
SDEM
SCHE
Communication Services
SDEM
SCHE
Basic Materials
SDEM
SCHE
Consumer Cyclical
SDEM
SCHE
Technology
SDEM
SCHE
Energy
SDEM
SCHE
Healthcare
SDEM
SCHE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDEM vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank
SDEM
SCHE
SDEM vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDEM | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 1.97 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 6.75 | +1.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDEM vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than SCHE's maximum drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and SCHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDEM | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.38% | -36.20% | -11.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -11.29% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.34% | -17.08% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.08% | -31.40% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.38% | -36.20% | -11.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -3.67% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.55% | -12.53% | -8.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 3.29% | -0.30% |
Volatility
SDEM vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) is 4.43%, while Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that SDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDEM | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 6.54% | -2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 15.24% | -3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.15% | 17.61% | -3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 17.90% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 19.41% | -0.35% |
SDEM vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHE's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDEM vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison
SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than SCHE's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.66% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 3.83% | 2.88% | 2.86% | 2.09% | 3.27% | 2.64% | 2.31% | 2.27% | 2.50% |
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 5.05% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 7.50% | 8.86% | 8.14% | 6.30% | 6.47% | 6.55% | 5.01% | 5.06% | 6.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDEM and SCHE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHE has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to SDEM (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs SCHE's -36.20%.
On 10-year performance, SCHE leads with 7.95% vs 4.04% for SDEM. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SDEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHE has performed better with a 7.95% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.
SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 2.66% for SCHE.
SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while SCHE tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.11% for SCHE.
SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDEM and SCHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer