PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDEM vs. SCHE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDEM vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly higher than SCHE's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SDEM has underperformed SCHE with an annualized return of 4.40%, while SCHE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.97% annualized return.


SDEM

1D
-0.42%
1M
4.50%
6M
5.07%
YTD
13.99%
1Y
28.41%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
4.40%
ALL TIME*
3.94%

SCHE

1D
0.87%
1M
0.50%
6M
4.90%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
7.97%
ALL TIME*
4.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$121.98M$115.93M$116.46M
$101.46K$99.85K$114.98K

SDEM vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
13.99%32.01%4.02%12.64%-21.53%2.11%-11.13%17.56%-17.40%16.57%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
10.15%26.54%10.60%8.93%-17.84%-0.65%14.49%20.31%-13.57%32.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SDEM and SCHE is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015

0.79

The correlation between SDEM and SCHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDEM vs. SCHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDEM
SCHE

Financial Services

27.7%
21.1%

Industrials

10.2%
6.8%

Real Estate

7.7%
1.6%

Utilities

7.2%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
8.9%

Communication Services

5.5%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
3.3%

Basic Materials

5.2%
7.0%

Energy

3.6%
4.2%

Technology

2.5%
33.8%

Healthcare

1.9%
3.4%

Financial Services

SDEM
27.7%
SCHE
21.1%

Industrials

SDEM
10.2%
SCHE
6.8%

Real Estate

SDEM
7.7%
SCHE
1.6%

Utilities

SDEM
7.2%
SCHE
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SDEM
6.0%
SCHE
8.9%

Communication Services

SDEM
5.5%
SCHE
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

SDEM
5.4%
SCHE
3.3%

Basic Materials

SDEM
5.2%
SCHE
7.0%

Energy

SDEM
3.6%
SCHE
4.2%

Technology

SDEM
2.5%
SCHE
33.8%

Healthcare

SDEM
1.9%
SCHE
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDEM vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDEM
SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDEM vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDEMSCHEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.94

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.60

6.43

+3.17

SDEM vs. SCHE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the SCHE Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDEM and SCHE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDEM vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than SCHE's maximum drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and SCHE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDEMSCHEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.38%

-36.20%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-11.29%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-17.08%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.08%

-31.38%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.38%

-36.20%

-11.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-3.13%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.46%

-12.51%

-7.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.40%

-0.37%

Volatility

SDEM vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) is 3.94%, while Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that SDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDEMSCHEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

5.70%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

15.60%

-3.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

17.99%

-3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

17.87%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

19.44%

-0.39%

SDEM vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDEM vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison

SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than SCHE's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.64%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
4.91%5.27%7.28%7.50%8.86%8.14%6.30%6.47%6.55%5.01%5.06%6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDEM and SCHE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHE has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to SDEM (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs SCHE's -36.20%.

On 10-year performance, SCHE leads with 7.97% vs 4.40% for SDEM. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SDEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHE has performed better with a 7.97% return vs 4.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.

SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 2.64% for SCHE.

SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while SCHE tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.11% for SCHE.

SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDEM and SCHE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer