SDD vs. CRSH
SDD (ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 (-200%), while CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. SDD is passively managed, while CRSH is actively managed. Over the past year, SDD returned -41.53% vs -21.62% for CRSH. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
SDD vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDD achieves a -23.94% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 7.94% return.
SDD
- 1D
- 3.63%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- -23.94%
- 6M
- -22.77%
- 1Y
- -41.53%
- 3Y*
- -23.30%
- 5Y*
- -14.95%
- 10Y*
- -26.75%
CRSH
- 1D
- 4.09%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 9.66%
- 1Y
- -21.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDD vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SDD ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 | -23.94% | -14.69% | -17.21% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 7.94% | -13.40% | -51.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDD and CRSH is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDD vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
SDD
CRSH
SDD vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDD | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.92 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.65 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | -1.02 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDD | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | -0.60 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.67 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
SDD vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDD drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than CRSH's maximum drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDD and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDD | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.93% | -63.68% | -36.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.74% | -33.45% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -57.53% | -42.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.92% | -43.17% | -43.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.68% | 21.25% | +5.43% |
Volatility
SDD vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) is 9.35%, while YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a volatility of 10.96%. This indicates that SDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDD | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 10.96% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.32% | 22.68% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.17% | 36.91% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.23% | 47.50% | -4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.16% | 47.50% | -2.34% |
SDD vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDD vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
SDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, less than CRSH's 93.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 93.62% | 138.78% | 94.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDD ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 | 6.11% | 5.07% | 4.34% | 3.84% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDD and CRSH have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRSH has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to SDD (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDD dropped -99.93% vs CRSH's -63.68%.
On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -21.62% vs -41.53% for SDD. On fees, SDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SDD has been the lower-risk option at 9.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -21.62% return vs -41.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 93.62%, compared with 6.11% for SDD.
SDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CRSH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDD and 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDD and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer