PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDD vs. QQQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDD vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDD achieves a -30.11% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's 3.54% return.


SDD

1D
-0.48%
1M
-8.66%
YTD
-30.11%
6M
-26.49%
1Y
-46.17%
3Y*
-26.64%
5Y*
-16.61%
10Y*
-27.79%

QQQD

1D
2.22%
1M
8.27%
YTD
3.54%
6M
4.43%
1Y
-16.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDD vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SDD
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
-30.11%-14.69%-15.74%
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
3.54%-20.32%-27.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SDD and QQQD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDD vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDD
SDD Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDD Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQD
QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDD vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDDQQQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.88

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.03

-0.72

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.77

-1.12

-0.64

SDD vs. QQQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDD Sharpe Ratio is -1.28, which is lower than the QQQD Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDD and QQQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDD vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDD drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDD and QQQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDDQQQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-49.47%

-50.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.75%

-23.44%

-21.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

-44.02%

-55.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.93%

-30.60%

-56.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.82%

16.44%

+11.38%

Volatility

SDD vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 7.18%. This indicates that SDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDDQQQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.33%

7.18%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.62%

15.76%

+8.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.33%

20.91%

+15.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.19%

26.87%

+16.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.18%

26.87%

+18.31%

SDD vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDD vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison

SDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than QQQD's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
3.82%4.33%5.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDD
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
6.65%5.07%4.34%3.84%0.33%0.00%0.00%1.20%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDD and QQQD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDD has higher volatility (9.33%) compared to QQQD (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDD dropped -99.93% vs QQQD's -49.47%.

On 1-year performance, QQQD leads with -16.79% vs -46.17% for SDD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 7.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQD has performed better with a -16.79% return vs -46.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SDD.

SDD has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 3.82% for QQQD.

SDD tracks S&P Small Cap 600 (-200%), while QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDD and 0.57% for QQQD.

QQQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.81 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDD and QQQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer