PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDD vs. QQQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDD vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDD achieves a -32.06% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's -1.92% return.


SDD

1D
0.02%
1M
-2.88%
6M
-25.07%
YTD
-32.06%
1Y
-40.76%
3Y*
-24.65%
5Y*
-17.22%
10Y*
-26.98%

QQQD

1D
-1.37%
1M
-4.20%
6M
-1.58%
YTD
-1.92%
1Y
-16.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDD vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SDD
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
-32.06%-14.69%-15.74%
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
-1.92%-20.32%-27.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SDD and QQQD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDD vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDD
SDD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQD
QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDD vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDDQQQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.88

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.77

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.45

-1.31

-0.14

SDD vs. QQQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDD Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the QQQD Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDD and QQQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDD vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDD drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDD and QQQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDDQQQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-49.47%

-50.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.71%

-21.94%

-25.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.94%

-46.97%

-52.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.96%

-30.91%

-56.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.29%

13.10%

+14.19%

Volatility

SDD vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 8.08%. This indicates that SDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDDQQQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.95%

8.08%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.79%

16.54%

+8.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.96%

21.31%

+14.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.10%

26.84%

+16.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.02%

26.84%

+18.18%

SDD vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDD vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison

SDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than QQQD's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
3.14%4.33%5.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDD
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
6.33%5.07%4.34%3.84%0.33%0.00%0.00%1.20%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDD and QQQD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDD has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to QQQD (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDD dropped -99.94% vs QQQD's -49.47%.

On 1-year performance, QQQD leads with -16.58% vs -40.76% for SDD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQD has performed better with a -16.58% return vs -40.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SDD.

SDD has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 3.14% for QQQD.

SDD tracks S&P Small Cap 600 (-200%), while QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDD and 0.57% for QQQD.

QQQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.80 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDD and QQQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer