SDCI vs. GLNCY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY).

SDCI is an actively managed fund by Wainwright, Inc.. It was launched on May 3, 2018.

Performance

SDCI vs. GLNCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SDCI vs. GLNCY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund	22.70%	17.60%	17.91%	-0.88%	33.23%	36.52%	-10.61%	-2.36%	-13.91%
GLNCY Glencore PLC ADR	37.24%	28.74%	-25.38%	-1.13%	40.92%	66.50%	1.46%	-10.33%	-24.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 22.70% return, which is significantly lower than GLNCY's 37.24% return.

SDCI

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 9.08%
• YTD: 22.70%
• 6M: 21.72%
• 1Y: 29.96%
• 3Y*: 21.13%
• 5Y*: 22.45%
• 10Y*: —

GLNCY

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 37.24%
• 6M: 63.76%
• 1Y: 111.30%
• 3Y*: 14.92%
• 5Y*: 19.38%
• 10Y*: 17.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SDCI vs. GLNCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDCI

SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 80
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 79

GLNCY

GLNCY Risk / Return Rank: 94
GLNCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GLNCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
GLNCY Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GLNCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GLNCY Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDCI vs. GLNCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDCI	GLNCY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.86	-1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.26	-1.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.47	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	5.49	-2.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.09	19.68	-10.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDCI vs. GLNCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the GLNCY Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDCI and GLNCY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDCI	GLNCY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	2.86	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.22	0.54	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.09	+0.56

Correlation

The correlation between SDCI and GLNCY is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SDCI vs. GLNCY - Dividend Comparison

SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than GLNCY's 1.33% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund	3.00%	3.68%	5.92%	3.46%	33.49%	19.26%	0.20%	0.93%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GLNCY Glencore PLC ADR	1.33%	1.83%	2.98%	8.68%	5.56%	3.00%	0.00%	5.50%	4.70%	1.08%	0.00%	13.64%

Drawdowns

SDCI vs. GLNCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum GLNCY drawdown of -85.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and GLNCY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDCI	GLNCY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.79%	-85.04%	+39.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-20.22%	+8.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.55%	-54.06%	+35.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-1.19%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.80%	-32.69%	+20.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	5.64%	-2.12%

Volatility

SDCI vs. GLNCY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) is 7.05%, while Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that SDCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLNCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDCI	GLNCY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.05%	9.28%	-2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.92%	25.13%	-11.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.34%	39.18%	-20.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.45%	35.92%	-17.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.11%	39.70%	-22.59%