PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLNCY vs. TMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GLNCY vs. TMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY) and TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLNCY achieves a 50.16% return, which is significantly higher than TMC's -0.81% return.


GLNCY

1D
-2.29%
1M
8.55%
YTD
50.16%
6M
61.54%
1Y
118.41%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
17.27%
10Y*
19.48%

TMC

1D
-5.70%
1M
17.92%
YTD
-0.81%
6M
-20.73%
1Y
45.37%
3Y*
109.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLNCY vs. TMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GLNCY
Glencore PLC ADR
50.16%28.74%-25.38%-1.13%40.92%9.68%
TMC
TMC the metals company Inc.
-0.81%450.89%1.82%42.86%-62.98%-77.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GLNCY and TMC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021

0.18

The correlation between GLNCY and TMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLNCY:

$97.82B

TMC:

$1.97T

EPS

GLNCY:

-$0.21

TMC:

-$0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLNCY:

$478.28B

TMC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLNCY:

$10.29B

TMC:

-$136.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

GLNCY:

$18.49B

TMC:

-$296.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLNCY vs. TMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLNCY
GLNCY Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GLNCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLNCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLNCY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GLNCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLNCY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

TMC
TMC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLNCY vs. TMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY) and TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLNCYTMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.16

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.10

0.74

+7.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.92

1.23

+23.69

GLNCY vs. TMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLNCY Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is higher than the TMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLNCY and TMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLNCYTMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59

0.44

+3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

-0.08

+0.18

Drawdowns

GLNCY vs. TMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLNCY drawdown since its inception was -85.04%, smaller than the maximum TMC drawdown of -95.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNCY and TMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLNCYTMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.04%

-95.58%

+10.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.71%

-61.65%

+46.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.44%

-74.56%

+21.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-50.84%

+48.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.33%

-79.62%

+47.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

36.96%

-32.19%

Volatility

GLNCY vs. TMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY) is 10.04%, while TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) has a volatility of 24.46%. This indicates that GLNCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLNCYTMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

24.46%

-14.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.86%

69.15%

-44.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.22%

103.69%

-70.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.68%

113.08%

-77.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.05%

113.08%

-74.03%

Dividends

GLNCY vs. TMC - Dividend Comparison

GLNCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while TMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLNCY
Glencore PLC ADR
1.66%1.83%2.98%8.68%5.56%3.00%0.00%5.50%4.70%1.08%0.00%13.64%
TMC
TMC the metals company Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GLNCY vs. TMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Glencore PLC ADR and TMC the metals company Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B140.00B202120222023202420252026
129.94B
0
(GLNCY) Total Revenue
(TMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GLNCY and TMC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMC has higher volatility (24.46%) compared to GLNCY (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLNCY dropped -85.04% vs TMC's -95.58%.

GLNCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLNCY and TMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer