GLNCY vs. CPER

In the year-to-date period, GLNCY achieves a -15.20% return, which is significantly lower than CPER's 16.10% return. Over the past 10 years, GLNCY has underperformed CPER with an annualized return of 2.59%, while CPER has yielded a comparatively higher 4.67% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY) and United States Copper Index Fund (CPER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GLNCY Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the CPER Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLNCY and CPER, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GLNCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, while CPER has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GLNCY drawdown since its inception was -85.03%, which is greater than CPER's maximum drawdown of -54.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNCY and CPER.

Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY) has a higher volatility of 11.93% compared to United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) at 9.42%. This indicates that GLNCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.