PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLNCY vs. TIP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GLNCY and TIP is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.0

Performance

GLNCY vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-24.68%
0.13%
GLNCY
TIP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GLNCY:

-0.55

TIP:

1.19

Sortino Ratio

GLNCY:

-0.61

TIP:

1.68

Omega Ratio

GLNCY:

0.93

TIP:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

GLNCY:

-0.44

TIP:

0.46

Martin Ratio

GLNCY:

-0.93

TIP:

3.33

Ulcer Index

GLNCY:

17.51%

TIP:

1.55%

Daily Std Dev

GLNCY:

29.55%

TIP:

4.35%

Max Drawdown

GLNCY:

-85.08%

TIP:

-14.56%

Current Drawdown

GLNCY:

-36.92%

TIP:

-5.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLNCY achieves a -8.13% return, which is significantly lower than TIP's 2.22% return. Over the past 10 years, GLNCY has outperformed TIP with an annualized return of 3.38%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.16% annualized return.


GLNCY

YTD

-8.13%

1M

-12.64%

6M

-24.68%

1Y

-14.28%

5Y*

13.06%

10Y*

3.38%

TIP

YTD

2.22%

1M

1.66%

6M

0.13%

1Y

5.42%

5Y*

1.61%

10Y*

2.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLNCY vs. TIP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLNCY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLNCY is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLNCY is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLNCY is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLNCY is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLNCY is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLNCY is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

TIP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TIP is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TIP is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TIP is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TIP is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TIP is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TIP is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLNCY vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLNCY, currently valued at -0.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.551.19
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLNCY, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.611.68
The chart of Omega ratio for GLNCY, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.931.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLNCY, currently valued at -0.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.440.46
The chart of Martin ratio for GLNCY, currently valued at -0.93, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.933.33
GLNCY
TIP

The current GLNCY Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLNCY and TIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.55
1.19
GLNCY
TIP

Dividends

GLNCY vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

GLNCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than TIP's 2.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GLNCY
Glencore PLC ADR
3.24%2.98%8.68%5.56%3.17%3.19%6.47%5.52%1.34%0.00%15.47%3.71%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
2.47%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%1.67%

Drawdowns

GLNCY vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLNCY drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNCY and TIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-36.92%
-5.85%
GLNCY
TIP

Volatility

GLNCY vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

Glencore PLC ADR (GLNCY) has a higher volatility of 10.83% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 1.23%. This indicates that GLNCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.83%
1.23%
GLNCY
TIP
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab