PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SDCI vs. FLJH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SDCIFLJH
YTD Return11.84%23.47%
1Y Return7.65%24.79%
3Y Return (Ann)13.75%16.94%
5Y Return (Ann)13.72%16.40%
Sharpe Ratio0.741.29
Sortino Ratio1.101.69
Omega Ratio1.131.25
Calmar Ratio0.921.22
Martin Ratio2.764.41
Ulcer Index3.52%5.62%
Daily Std Dev13.20%19.31%
Max Drawdown-45.79%-31.36%
Current Drawdown-2.49%-5.22%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between SDCI and FLJH is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SDCI vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 23.47% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.87%
2.83%
SDCI
FLJH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SDCI vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio.


SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Expense ratio chart for SDCI: current value at 0.70% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.70%
Expense ratio chart for FLJH: current value at 0.09% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.09%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SDCI vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDCI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SDCI, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.74
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SDCI, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SDCI, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SDCI, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SDCI, currently valued at 2.76, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.76
FLJH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLJH, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLJH, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.69
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLJH, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLJH, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLJH, currently valued at 4.41, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.41

SDCI vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDCI and FLJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.74
1.29
SDCI
FLJH

Dividends

SDCI vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than FLJH's 22.61% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
1.09%3.46%33.49%19.25%0.20%0.93%0.68%0.00%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
22.61%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.05%

Drawdowns

SDCI vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, which is greater than FLJH's maximum drawdown of -31.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and FLJH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.49%
-5.22%
SDCI
FLJH

Volatility

SDCI vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) is 4.01%, while Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that SDCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.01%
4.84%
SDCI
FLJH