SD vs. EQT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) and EQT Corporation (EQT).

Performance

SD vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SD vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SD SandRidge Energy, Inc.	13.83%	28.18%	-0.35%	-8.19%	62.81%	237.42%	-26.89%	-44.28%	-63.88%	-10.53%
EQT EQT Corporation	19.07%	17.64%	21.41%	16.20%	57.64%	71.60%	17.27%	-41.82%	-38.82%	-12.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SD : $601.97M EQT : $39.75B
EPS SD : $1.91 EQT : $3.30
PE Ratio SD : 8.55 EQT : 19.30
PEG Ratio SD : 0.75 EQT : 0.13
PS Ratio SD : 3.84 EQT : 4.55
PB Ratio SD : 1.18 EQT : 1.67
Total Revenue (TTM) SD : $156.36M EQT : $8.64B
Gross Profit (TTM) SD : $67.45M EQT : $8.42B
EBITDA (TTM) SD : $97.12M EQT : $5.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SD achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's 19.07% return.

SD

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: -6.30%
• YTD: 13.83%
• 6M: 46.88%
• 1Y: 48.23%
• 3Y*: 16.41%
• 5Y*: 41.48%
• 10Y*: —

EQT

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: 19.07%
• 6M: 17.60%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 27.75%
• 5Y*: 29.08%
• 10Y*: 6.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SD vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SD

SD Risk / Return Rank: 77
SD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SD Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SD Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SD Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

EQT

EQT Risk / Return Rank: 61
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SD vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SD	EQT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	0.57	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	0.95	+0.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.13	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	1.17	+1.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.47	2.31	+3.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SD vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SD Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SD and EQT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SD	EQT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	0.57	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	0.67	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.32	-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between SD and EQT is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SD vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

SD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than EQT's 1.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SD SandRidge Energy, Inc.	2.88%	3.19%	17.51%	16.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQT EQT Corporation	1.01%	1.19%	1.37%	1.57%	1.63%	0.00%	0.24%	1.10%	0.42%	0.21%	0.18%	0.23%

Drawdowns

SD vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SD drawdown since its inception was -97.03%, which is greater than EQT's maximum drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SD and EQT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SD	EQT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.03%	-91.51%	-5.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.79%	-18.39%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.05%	-42.56%	-14.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.84%	-6.32%	-13.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.39%	-23.38%	-28.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.82%	9.29%	-0.47%

Volatility

SD vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 8.04%. This indicates that SD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SD	EQT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.31%	8.04%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.99%	23.63%	+1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.15%	35.89%	+2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.23%	43.78%	+5.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.42%	48.95%	+17.47%

Financials