SD vs. EQT
SD (SandRidge Energy, Inc.) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 5 years, SD returned 24.65%/yr vs 20.13%/yr for EQT. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SD vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SD achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's -3.41% return.
SD
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -10.20%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 6M
- -1.73%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 24.65%
- 10Y*
- —
EQT
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -11.12%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -3.93%
- 1Y
- -13.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.09%
- 5Y*
- 20.13%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
SD vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SD SandRidge Energy, Inc. | -2.07% | 28.18% | -0.35% | -8.19% | 62.81% | 237.42% | -26.89% | -44.28% | -63.88% | -10.53% |
EQT EQT Corporation | -3.41% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SD and EQT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SD and EQT shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SD:
$508.27M
EQT:
$32.18B
SD:
$2.06
EQT:
$5.40
SD:
6.68
EQT:
9.53
SD:
0.58
EQT:
0.08
SD:
3.10
EQT:
3.18
SD:
0.97
EQT:
1.28
SD:
$163.53M
EQT:
$10.03B
SD:
$48.88M
EQT:
$6.43B
SD:
$91.86M
EQT:
$7.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SD vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
SD
EQT
SD vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SD | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.95 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | -0.55 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.20 | -1.19 | +4.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SD vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SD drawdown since its inception was -97.03%, which is greater than EQT's maximum drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SD and EQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SD | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.03% | -91.51% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.84% | -25.12% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.87% | -31.62% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.05% | -42.56% | -14.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.04% | -24.00% | -7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.82% | -23.34% | -27.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.81% | 12.11% | -3.30% |
Volatility
SD vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) has a higher volatility of 12.58% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 6.65%. This indicates that SD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SD | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 6.65% | +5.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.17% | 20.88% | +6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.80% | 32.32% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.29% | 42.59% | +5.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.32% | 48.92% | +17.40% |
Dividends
SD vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
SD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than EQT's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.27% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
SD SandRidge Energy, Inc. | 5.02% | 3.19% | 17.51% | 16.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SD vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SandRidge Energy, Inc. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SD vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison
SD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SandRidge Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 49.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.
SD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SandRidge Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.86M and revenue of 49.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.9%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.
SD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SandRidge Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 18.67M and revenue of 49.78M, resulting in a net margin of 37.5%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SD and EQT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SD has higher volatility (12.58%) compared to EQT (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SD dropped -97.03% vs EQT's -91.51%.
SD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SD and EQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer