SCZM vs. HYMC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCZM (Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd) and HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — SCZM in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, HYMC in Gold. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

SCZM vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd (SCZM) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SCZM

• 1D: -10.56%
• 1M: -5.46%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYMC

• 1D: -4.94%
• 1M: -10.92%
• YTD: 35.25%
• 6M: 181.03%
• 1Y: 771.27%
• 3Y*: 112.13%
• 5Y*: -3.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCZM vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SCZM Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd	-39.72%
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	-18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SCZM and HYMC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	0.79

Fundamentals

Market Cap SCZM : $700.99M HYMC : $2.89B
EPS SCZM : $0.66 HYMC : -$1.64
PB Ratio SCZM : 3.35 HYMC : 12.89
Total Revenue (TTM) SCZM : $385.50M HYMC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) SCZM : $127.93M HYMC : -$4.65M
EBITDA (TTM) SCZM : $144.69M HYMC : -$69.17M

Return for Risk

SCZM vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMC

HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 97
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCZM vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd (SCZM) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCZM	HYMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.77	-0.10	-0.67

Drawdowns

SCZM vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCZM drawdown since its inception was -55.82%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZM and HYMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCZM	HYMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.82%	-98.89%	+43.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-46.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-63.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-95.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.90%	-79.68%	+25.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.10%	-63.32%	+23.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	21.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCZM	HYMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	25.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	93.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	97.88%	118.80%	-20.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	97.88%	152.42%	-54.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	97.88%	123.02%	-25.14%

Dividends

SCZM vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither SCZM nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCZM and HYMC in my portfolio?

SCZM and HYMC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.