SCZM vs. HYMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd (SCZM) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC).
Performance
SCZM vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCZM vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCZM Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd | -30.66% |
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | -11.04% |
Fundamentals
SCZM:
$799.41M
HYMC:
$1.52B
SCZM:
$0.81
HYMC:
-$1.24
SCZM:
4.37
HYMC:
7.13
SCZM:
$303.07M
HYMC:
$0.00
SCZM:
$97.49M
HYMC:
$0.00
SCZM:
$124.14M
HYMC:
-$27.62M
Returns By Period
SCZM
- 1D
- 12.91%
- 1M
- -31.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYMC
- 1D
- 15.52%
- 1M
- -30.12%
- YTD
- 48.09%
- 6M
- 467.74%
- 1Y
- 986.42%
- 3Y*
- 101.16%
- 5Y*
- -2.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZM vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank
SCZM
HYMC
SCZM vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd (SCZM) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCZM | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 8.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.74 | -0.10 | -0.64 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZM and HYMC is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCZM vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCZM nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SCZM vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZM drawdown since its inception was -55.82%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZM and HYMC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZM | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.82% | -98.89% | +43.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -46.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -95.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.97% | -77.75% | +30.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.16% | -63.04% | +29.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.59% | — |
Volatility
SCZM vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCZM | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 38.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 96.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.38% | 118.82% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.38% | 152.55% | -35.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.38% | 123.75% | -6.37% |
Financials
SCZM vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities