SCZM vs. CRM
SCZM (Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd) and CRM (salesforce.com, inc.) are both stocks. SCZM operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while CRM operates in Software - Application (Technology). At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SCZM vs. CRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCZM
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRM
- 1D
- -5.09%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- -27.87%
- 6M
- -19.82%
- 1Y
- -27.39%
- 3Y*
- -3.17%
- 5Y*
- -4.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
SCZM vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCZM Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd | -32.61% |
CRM salesforce.com, inc. | -13.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZM and CRM is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | -0.06 |
Fundamentals
SCZM:
$783.79M
CRM:
$166.02B
SCZM:
$0.66
CRM:
$8.59
SCZM:
12.66
CRM:
22.18
SCZM:
2.01
CRM:
4.16
SCZM:
3.74
CRM:
4.85
SCZM:
$385.50M
CRM:
$42.83B
SCZM:
$127.93M
CRM:
$33.25B
SCZM:
$144.69M
CRM:
$12.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZM vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank
SCZM
CRM
SCZM vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd (SCZM) and salesforce.com, inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCZM | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.69 | 0.46 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
SCZM vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZM drawdown since its inception was -55.82%, smaller than the maximum CRM drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZM and CRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZM | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.82% | -70.50% | +14.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -54.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -58.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.45% | -47.66% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.95% | -16.10% | -23.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.18% | — |
Volatility
SCZM vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZM | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.91% | 37.89% | +59.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.91% | 37.02% | +59.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.91% | 35.34% | +61.57% |
Dividends
SCZM vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison
SCZM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRM salesforce.com, inc. | 0.89% | 0.63% | 0.48% |
SCZM Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SCZM vs. CRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd and salesforce.com, inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SCZM vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison
SCZM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd reported a gross profit of 42.87M and revenue of 127.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.6%.
CRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.
SCZM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd reported an operating income of 33.90M and revenue of 127.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
CRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
SCZM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd reported a net income of 28.47M and revenue of 127.53M, resulting in a net margin of 22.3%.
CRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCZM and CRM have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SCZM and CRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer