PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCZ vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCZ vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 8.03%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.


SCZ

1D
-0.72%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.56%
6M
12.13%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
8.03%

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCZ vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
9.56%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SCZ and SLV is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007

0.31

SCZ vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCZ
SLV

Industrials

24.6%

-

Financial Services

12.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%

-

Basic Materials

10.7%
100.0%

Real Estate

10.3%

-

Technology

9.1%

-

Healthcare

5.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Communication Services

4.1%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Utilities

2.8%

-

Industrials

SCZ
24.6%
SLV

-

Financial Services

SCZ
12.5%
SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

SCZ
11.8%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

SCZ
10.7%
SLV
100.0%

Real Estate

SCZ
10.3%
SLV

-

Technology

SCZ
9.1%
SLV

-

Healthcare

SCZ
5.5%
SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

SCZ
5.0%
SLV

-

Communication Services

SCZ
4.1%
SLV

-

Energy

SCZ
3.7%
SLV

-

Utilities

SCZ
2.8%
SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCZ vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCZ vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCZSLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

1.89

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

2.07

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.62

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.08

5.64

+2.43

SCZ vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCZ and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCZSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.89

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.58

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.49

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.25

+0.02

Drawdowns

SCZ vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCZSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.86%

-76.28%

+14.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-42.45%

+31.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-42.45%

+27.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.87%

-42.45%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.07%

-42.81%

+1.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-37.30%

+35.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.06%

-44.67%

+31.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

19.67%

-16.69%

Volatility

SCZ vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) is 4.57%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that SCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCZSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

16.30%

-11.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

58.31%

-46.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

58.90%

-44.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

36.15%

-19.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

31.84%

-14.41%

SCZ vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCZ vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.01%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCZ and SLV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to SCZ (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 8.03% for SCZ. On fees, SCZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

SCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while SLV is Silver. SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCZ and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer