SCZ vs. SLV
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCZ returned 8.70%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for SLV. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
SCZ vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 8.70%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.
SCZ
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.07%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
SLV
- 1D
- -5.40%
- 1M
- -18.48%
- YTD
- -13.49%
- 6M
- -14.05%
- 1Y
- 69.08%
- 3Y*
- 39.38%
- 5Y*
- 18.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
SCZ vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 7.29% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -13.49% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and SLV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007 | 0.32 |
The correlation between SCZ and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
SLV
SCZ vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCZ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 1.47 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | 3.16 | +3.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -76.28% | +14.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -47.23% | +35.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | -47.23% | +32.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -47.23% | +10.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -47.23% | +6.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -47.23% | +43.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.03% | -44.65% | +31.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 21.91% | -18.88% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) is 5.14%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.34%. This indicates that SCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 14.34% | -9.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 59.27% | -46.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.01% | 60.33% | -45.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 36.59% | -19.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 32.09% | -14.89% |
SCZ vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCZ vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.25% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCZ and SLV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to SCZ (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 12.68% vs 8.70% for SCZ. On fees, SCZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SCZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
SCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while SLV is Silver. SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.50% for SLV.
SCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer