SCZ vs. SCHB
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCZ returned 8.64%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for SCHB. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
SCZ vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCZ having a 9.70% return and SCHB slightly lower at 9.68%. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 8.64%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.
SCZ
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
SCHB
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
SCZ vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.70% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 9.68% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 21.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and SCHB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SCZ and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCZ vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCZ
SCHB
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
SCZ
SCHB
Financial Services
SCZ
SCHB
Consumer Cyclical
SCZ
SCHB
Technology
SCZ
SCHB
Basic Materials
SCZ
SCHB
Real Estate
SCZ
SCHB
Healthcare
SCZ
SCHB
Consumer Defensive
SCZ
SCHB
Communication Services
SCZ
SCHB
Energy
SCZ
SCHB
Utilities
SCZ
SCHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
SCHB
SCZ vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCZ | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.78 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 12.44 | -5.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -35.27% | -26.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -8.91% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | -19.34% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -25.41% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -35.27% | -5.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -2.15% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.05% | -4.11% | -8.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 1.99% | +1.03% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 4.60%. This indicates that SCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 4.60% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 9.86% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.93% | 12.63% | +2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 17.31% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 18.35% | -0.92% |
SCZ vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCZ vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than SCHB's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.01% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCZ and SCHB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCZ has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to SCHB (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs SCHB's -35.27%.
On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.01% vs 8.64% for SCZ. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.03% for SCHB.
SCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.03% for SCHB.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer