SCZ vs. NISM
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and NISM (NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. SCZ is passively managed, while NISM is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NISM.
Performance
SCZ vs. NISM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCZ
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 17.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.21%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
NISM
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCZ vs. NISM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | -1.88% |
NISM NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | -2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and NISM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2026 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. NISM — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
NISM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCZ vs. NISM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (NISM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCZ | NISM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.58 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. NISM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than NISM's maximum drawdown of -4.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and NISM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | NISM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -4.35% | -57.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -2.77% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.00% | -1.75% | -11.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | — | — |
Volatility
SCZ vs. NISM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | NISM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 14.27% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 14.27% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 14.27% | +2.87% |
SCZ vs. NISM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than NISM's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCZ vs. NISM - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than NISM's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NISM NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.23% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCZ and NISM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NISM.
SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.25% for NISM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and New York Life Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.70% for NISM.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and NISM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer