PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NISM vs. CLOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NISM vs. CLOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (NISM) and NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NISM

1D
-1.87%
1M
1.42%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLOO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NISM vs. CLOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NISM and CLOO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2026

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF

Return for Risk

NISM vs. CLOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (NISM) and NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NISM vs. CLOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NISM vs. CLOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NISM drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, which is greater than CLOO's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NISM and CLOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NISMCLOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-0.04%

-4.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

0.00%

-2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-0.00%

-1.68%

Volatility

NISM vs. CLOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NISMCLOODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

0.50%

+14.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

0.50%

+14.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.55%

0.50%

+14.05%

NISM vs. CLOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NISM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

NISM vs. CLOO - Dividend Comparison

NISM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than CLOO's 0.59% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


NISM and CLOO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLOO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLOO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NISM.

CLOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.24% for NISM.

NISM is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while CLOO is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for NISM and 0.25% for CLOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NISM and CLOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer