PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCZ vs. ISVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCZ vs. ISVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than ISVL's 7.81% return.


SCZ

1D
-2.02%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
7.29%
6M
6.99%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
8.70%

ISVL

1D
-1.20%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
7.81%
6M
7.79%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCZ vs. ISVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
7.29%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%5.68%
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
7.81%42.84%4.58%17.56%-13.69%8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SCZ and ISVL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021

0.96

The correlation between SCZ and ISVL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCZ vs. ISVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCZ
ISVL

Industrials

24.2%
22.1%

Financial Services

12.5%
21.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
11.1%

Technology

10.8%
4.9%

Basic Materials

10.2%
10.1%

Real Estate

9.9%
10.8%

Healthcare

5.9%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.7%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.8%

Energy

3.5%
6.0%

Utilities

2.2%
1.3%

Industrials

SCZ
24.2%
ISVL
22.1%

Financial Services

SCZ
12.5%
ISVL
21.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SCZ
12.3%
ISVL
11.1%

Technology

SCZ
10.8%
ISVL
4.9%

Basic Materials

SCZ
10.2%
ISVL
10.1%

Real Estate

SCZ
9.9%
ISVL
10.8%

Healthcare

SCZ
5.9%
ISVL
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

SCZ
4.7%
ISVL
4.7%

Communication Services

SCZ
3.8%
ISVL
2.8%

Energy

SCZ
3.5%
ISVL
6.0%

Utilities

SCZ
2.2%
ISVL
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCZ vs. ISVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ISVL
ISVL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISVL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ISVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCZ vs. ISVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCZISVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.23

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

8.70

-1.82

SCZ vs. ISVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the ISVL Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCZ and ISVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCZ vs. ISVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than ISVL's maximum drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and ISVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCZISVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.86%

-30.48%

-31.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-12.48%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-12.93%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.87%

-30.48%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-2.74%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-6.61%

-6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.20%

-0.17%

Volatility

SCZ vs. ISVL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) at 4.58%. This indicates that SCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCZISVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

4.58%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.69%

12.50%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.01%

14.82%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

16.93%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

16.77%

+0.43%

SCZ vs. ISVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ISVL's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCZ vs. ISVL - Dividend Comparison

SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than ISVL's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
3.20%2.69%3.92%3.82%3.37%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.25%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SCZ and ISVL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCZ has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to ISVL (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs ISVL's -30.48%.

On 5-year performance, ISVL leads with 10.69% vs 5.07% for SCZ. On fees, ISVL is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ISVL has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ISVL has performed better with a 10.69% return vs 5.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISVL is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.

SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 3.20% for ISVL.

SCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while ISVL is Small Cap Value Equities. SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while ISVL tracks FTSE Developed ex US ex Korea Small Cap Focused Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.30% for ISVL.

ISVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCZ and ISVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer