SCZ vs. BBCPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and BBCPX (Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund) are both funds - SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while BBCPX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Bridge Builder. Over the past 10 years, SCZ returned 8.03%/yr vs 2.36%/yr for BBCPX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBCPX.

Performance

SCZ vs. BBCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund (BBCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than BBCPX's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has outperformed BBCPX with an annualized return of 8.03%, while BBCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.36% annualized return.

SCZ

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 2.75%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 6M: 12.13%
• 1Y: 24.04%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 8.03%

BBCPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 0.03%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: 4.96%
• 5Y*: 0.85%
• 10Y*: 2.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCZ vs. BBCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF	9.56%	32.08%	1.52%	12.98%	-21.27%	10.12%	11.71%	24.68%	-17.64%	32.72%
BBCPX Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund	0.03%	8.97%	2.28%	6.58%	-13.24%	-0.29%	9.27%	9.31%	0.34%	4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SCZ and BBCPX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.13

Over the past year, SCZ and BBCPX have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

SCZ vs. BBCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCZ

SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 47
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 48

BBCPX

BBCPX Risk / Return Rank: 25
BBCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BBCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
BBCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BBCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BBCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCZ vs. BBCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund (BBCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCZ	BBCPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.44	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.12	+0.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	1.86	+0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.08	5.62	+2.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCZ vs. BBCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the BBCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCZ and BBCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCZ	BBCPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	1.44	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.14	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.49	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.53	-0.26

Drawdowns

SCZ vs. BBCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than BBCPX's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and BBCPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCZ	BBCPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.86%	-18.25%	-43.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.43%	-3.41%	-8.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.06%	-6.19%	-8.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.87%	-18.25%	-18.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.07%	-18.25%	-22.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	-1.55%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.06%	-3.79%	-9.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	1.11%	+1.87%

Volatility

SCZ vs. BBCPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund (BBCPX) at 1.66%. This indicates that SCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCZ	BBCPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	1.66%	+2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.95%	3.27%	+8.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.47%	4.40%	+10.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.74%	6.00%	+10.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	4.89%	+12.54%

SCZ vs. BBCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCPX's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCZ vs. BBCPX - Dividend Comparison

SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than BBCPX's 4.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBCPX Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund	4.51%	4.79%	4.93%	4.12%	2.96%	2.39%	4.70%	5.00%	3.47%	2.71%	0.64%	0.00%
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF	3.01%	3.30%	3.50%	2.96%	1.99%	2.96%	1.52%	3.52%	2.79%	2.38%	2.82%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCZ and BBCPX in my portfolio?

SCZ and BBCPX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCZ or BBCPX?

SCZ has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to BBCPX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs BBCPX's -18.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.