PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBCPX vs. FTBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBCPX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund (BBCPX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCPX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than FTBFX's 0.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BBCPX having a 2.35% annualized return and FTBFX not far ahead at 2.46%.


BBCPX

1D
0.11%
1M
1.06%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.55%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
2.35%

FTBFX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.89%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.92%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBCPX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBCPX
Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund
0.03%8.97%2.28%6.58%-13.24%-0.29%9.27%9.31%0.34%4.20%
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
0.57%7.50%2.13%7.25%-13.58%-0.44%9.34%9.89%-0.66%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BBCPX and FTBFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.95

The correlation between BBCPX and FTBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBCPX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBCPX
BBCPX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BBCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FTBFX
FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBCPX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund (BBCPX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBCPXFTBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.76

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.69

5.10

-0.41

BBCPX vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBCPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCPX and FTBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBCPX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCPX drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, roughly equal to the maximum FTBFX drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCPX and FTBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBCPXFTBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-18.25%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-2.89%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.19%

-5.82%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.25%

-18.25%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.25%

-18.25%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-1.31%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-2.32%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.00%

+0.17%

Volatility

BBCPX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund (BBCPX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) at 1.21%. This indicates that BBCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBCPXFTBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

1.21%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

2.88%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

3.80%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

5.67%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.90%

4.73%

+0.17%

BBCPX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBCPX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBCPX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

BBCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than FTBFX's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBCPX
Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund
4.51%4.79%4.93%4.12%2.96%2.39%4.70%5.00%3.47%2.71%0.64%0.00%
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
4.36%4.36%4.15%4.15%2.54%1.89%5.22%3.03%3.19%2.97%3.61%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BBCPX and FTBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBCPX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to FTBFX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCPX dropped -18.25% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.

FTBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBCPX and FTBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer