SCZ vs. AVDS
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and AVDS (Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. SCZ is passively managed, while AVDS is actively managed. Over the past year, SCZ returned 20.83% vs 28.49% for AVDS. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for AVDS.
Performance
SCZ vs. AVDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than AVDS's 9.01% return.
SCZ
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.07%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
AVDS
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCZ vs. AVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 7.29% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 1.75% |
AVDS Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF | 9.01% | 38.18% | 3.20% | 3.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and AVDS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2023 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SCZ and AVDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCZ vs. AVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCZ
AVDS
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
SCZ
AVDS
Financial Services
SCZ
AVDS
Consumer Cyclical
SCZ
AVDS
Technology
SCZ
AVDS
Basic Materials
SCZ
AVDS
Real Estate
SCZ
AVDS
Healthcare
SCZ
AVDS
Consumer Defensive
SCZ
AVDS
Communication Services
SCZ
AVDS
Energy
SCZ
AVDS
Utilities
SCZ
AVDS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. AVDS — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
AVDS
SCZ vs. AVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCZ | AVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.33 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.30 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | 8.74 | -1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. AVDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than AVDS's maximum drawdown of -13.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and AVDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | AVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -13.51% | -48.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -12.44% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -4.38% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.03% | -2.83% | -10.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.27% | -0.24% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. AVDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) is 5.14%, while Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that SCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | AVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 5.78% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 13.38% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.01% | 15.61% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 15.51% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 15.51% | +1.69% |
SCZ vs. AVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCZ vs. AVDS - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than AVDS's 3.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDS Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF | 3.37% | 2.37% | 3.07% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.25% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SCZ and AVDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVDS has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to SCZ (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs AVDS's -13.51%.
On 1-year performance, AVDS leads with 28.49% vs 20.83% for SCZ. On fees, AVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SCZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVDS has performed better with a 28.49% return vs 20.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
AVDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 3.25% for SCZ.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.30% for AVDS.
AVDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and AVDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer