PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVDS vs. FNDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVDS vs. FNDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AVDS having a 10.69% return and FNDC slightly higher at 11.12%.


AVDS

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.34%
6M
3.61%
YTD
10.69%
1Y
25.23%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.61%

FNDC

1D
-0.73%
1M
0.70%
6M
4.33%
YTD
11.12%
1Y
22.13%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
8.58%
ALL TIME*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.82M$2.17M$2.04M
$3.64M$3.98M$9.66M

AVDS vs. FNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVDS
Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF
10.69%38.18%3.20%3.58%
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
11.12%35.65%1.38%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between AVDS and FNDC is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2023

0.97

The correlation between AVDS and FNDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVDS vs. FNDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVDS
FNDC

Industrials

22.5%
24.6%

Basic Materials

15.4%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
13.4%

Financial Services

12.8%
11.9%

Technology

10.5%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
6.1%

Energy

5.2%
3.9%

Healthcare

4.8%
5.5%

Real Estate

3.2%
7.2%

Communication Services

3.1%
4.9%

Utilities

2.8%
2.6%

Industrials

AVDS
22.5%
FNDC
24.6%

Basic Materials

AVDS
15.4%
FNDC
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AVDS
13.9%
FNDC
13.4%

Financial Services

AVDS
12.8%
FNDC
11.9%

Technology

AVDS
10.5%
FNDC
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

AVDS
5.8%
FNDC
6.1%

Energy

AVDS
5.2%
FNDC
3.9%

Healthcare

AVDS
4.8%
FNDC
5.5%

Real Estate

AVDS
3.2%
FNDC
7.2%

Communication Services

AVDS
3.1%
FNDC
4.9%

Utilities

AVDS
2.8%
FNDC
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVDS vs. FNDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVDS
AVDS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDC
FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVDS vs. FNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVDSFNDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

1.99

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.40

6.92

+0.48

AVDS vs. FNDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the FNDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVDS and FNDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVDS vs. FNDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVDS drawdown since its inception was -13.51%, smaller than the maximum FNDC drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDS and FNDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVDSFNDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.51%

-43.22%

+29.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-11.20%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.51%

-12.00%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-2.30%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-8.38%

+5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

3.22%

+0.26%

Volatility

AVDS vs. FNDC - Volatility Comparison

Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC) at 4.22%. This indicates that AVDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVDSFNDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

4.22%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.83%

13.06%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.93%

15.04%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.50%

16.06%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

16.67%

-1.17%

AVDS vs. FNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDC's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVDS vs. FNDC - Dividend Comparison

AVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than FNDC's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVDS
Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF
2.29%2.37%3.07%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
3.66%3.86%3.59%2.86%1.98%2.58%1.77%2.71%2.68%1.94%1.95%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AVDS and FNDC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVDS has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to FNDC (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDS dropped -13.51% vs FNDC's -43.22%.

On 3-year performance, AVDS leads with 18.15% vs 16.65% for FNDC. On fees, AVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FNDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVDS has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 16.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDC.

FNDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 2.29% for AVDS.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for AVDS and 0.39% for FNDC.

AVDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVDS and FNDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer