FALN vs. DBA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA).
FALN and DBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FALN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. DBA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. It was launched on Jan 5, 2007. Both FALN and DBA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FALN or DBA.
Correlation
The correlation between FALN and DBA is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FALN vs. DBA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FALN:
1.83
DBA:
1.99
FALN:
2.57
DBA:
2.64
FALN:
1.33
DBA:
1.34
FALN:
3.02
DBA:
0.74
FALN:
10.93
DBA:
6.20
FALN:
0.78%
DBA:
5.55%
FALN:
4.66%
DBA:
17.30%
FALN:
-29.22%
DBA:
-67.97%
FALN:
-0.19%
DBA:
-28.33%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FALN having a 1.27% return and DBA slightly lower at 1.24%.
FALN
1.27%
1.35%
4.78%
8.30%
5.04%
N/A
DBA
1.24%
1.52%
15.45%
32.80%
12.46%
2.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FALN vs. DBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FALN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBA's 0.94% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FALN vs. DBA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FALN
DBA
FALN vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FALN vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison
FALN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than DBA's 4.03% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 6.16% | 6.23% | 5.38% | 5.08% | 3.39% | 5.14% | 5.35% | 5.97% | 6.99% | 3.54% |
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 4.03% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FALN vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FALN drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, smaller than the maximum DBA drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALN and DBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FALN vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) is 1.90%, while Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that FALN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.