PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FALN vs. BKLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FALN vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FALN achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than BKLN's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FALN has outperformed BKLN with an annualized return of 6.24%, while BKLN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.23% annualized return.


FALN

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.92%
6M
0.86%
YTD
1.86%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
6.24%
ALL TIME*
6.52%

BKLN

1D
0.05%
1M
0.73%
6M
1.39%
YTD
0.65%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
4.23%
ALL TIME*
3.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$118.65M$121.61M$174.22M
$23.72M$18.39M$26.66M

FALN vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
1.86%8.92%7.68%13.47%-13.79%5.40%14.85%17.42%-4.97%8.70%
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
0.65%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FALN and BKLN is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016

0.51

The correlation between FALN and BKLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FALN vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FALN
FALN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FALN vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FALNBKLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.27

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.42

4.91

+1.51

FALN vs. BKLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FALN Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the BKLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FALN and BKLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FALN vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FALN drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than BKLN's maximum drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALN and BKLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FALNBKLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.22%

-24.17%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.96%

-3.07%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.92%

-3.55%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.78%

-7.31%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.22%

-24.17%

-5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-0.05%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-1.08%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.79%

+0.18%

Volatility

FALN vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison

iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) at 0.34%. This indicates that FALN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FALNBKLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.34%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.79%

2.53%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.59%

2.77%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.33%

4.47%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.86%

6.41%

+2.45%

FALN vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FALN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FALN vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison

FALN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, which matches BKLN's 6.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.53%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
5.98%6.31%6.24%5.37%5.08%3.40%5.14%5.35%5.97%6.98%3.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FALN and BKLN have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FALN has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to BKLN (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FALN dropped -29.22% vs BKLN's -24.17%.

On 10-year performance, FALN leads with 6.24% vs 4.23% for BKLN. On fees, FALN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BKLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FALN has performed better with a 6.24% return vs 4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FALN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKLN.

BKLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 5.98% for FALN.

FALN is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BKLN is Bank Loan. FALN tracks Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index, while BKLN tracks Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FALN and 0.65% for BKLN.

BKLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FALN and BKLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer