FALN vs. IMTB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB).
FALN and IMTB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FALN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. IMTB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays US Universal 5-10 Years Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2016. Both FALN and IMTB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FALN or IMTB.
Key characteristics
| FALN | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.39% | -2.72% |
| 1Y Return | 11.01% | -0.43% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.10% | -3.38% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.04% | -0.22% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.87% | 7.44% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.22% | -18.15% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.58% | -11.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FALN and IMTB is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FALN vs. IMTB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FALN achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly higher than IMTB's -2.72% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FALN vs. IMTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FALN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FALN vs. IMTB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FALN vs. IMTB - Dividend Comparison
FALN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than IMTB's 4.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 5.31% | 5.37% | 5.08% | 3.40% | 5.14% | 5.35% | 5.97% | 6.98% | 3.55% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.03% | 4.13% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.75% | 0.40% |
Drawdowns
FALN vs. IMTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FALN drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than IMTB's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALN and IMTB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FALN vs. IMTB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) is 1.59%, while iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that FALN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.