FALN vs. IMTB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB).
FALN and IMTB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FALN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. IMTB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays US Universal 5-10 Years Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2016. Both FALN and IMTB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FALN or IMTB.
Correlation
The correlation between FALN and IMTB is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FALN vs. IMTB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FALN:
1.07
IMTB:
1.33
FALN:
1.46
IMTB:
1.95
FALN:
1.19
IMTB:
1.24
FALN:
1.86
IMTB:
0.61
FALN:
6.93
IMTB:
3.43
FALN:
0.76%
IMTB:
2.16%
FALN:
4.91%
IMTB:
5.57%
FALN:
-29.22%
IMTB:
-18.28%
FALN:
-2.13%
IMTB:
-3.53%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FALN achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than IMTB's 3.86% return.
FALN
-0.02%
-1.93%
-0.19%
5.16%
9.03%
N/A
IMTB
3.86%
0.97%
0.85%
7.32%
0.33%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FALN vs. IMTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FALN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FALN vs. IMTB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FALN
IMTB
FALN vs. IMTB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FALN vs. IMTB - Dividend Comparison
FALN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than IMTB's 4.35% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 6.32% | 6.24% | 5.37% | 5.08% | 3.40% | 5.14% | 5.35% | 5.97% | 6.98% | 3.55% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.35% | 4.42% | 4.13% | 2.90% | 2.32% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.75% | 0.40% |
Drawdowns
FALN vs. IMTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FALN drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than IMTB's maximum drawdown of -18.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALN and IMTB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FALN vs. IMTB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) has a higher volatility of 2.18% compared to iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) at 1.41%. This indicates that FALN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.