SCYB vs. CDX
SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) and CDX (Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. SCYB is passively managed, while CDX is actively managed. Over the past year, SCYB returned 7.67% vs -1.71% for CDX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCYB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for CDX.
Performance
SCYB vs. CDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCYB achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly higher than CDX's -2.25% return.
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- -2.25%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- -1.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCYB vs. CDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.84% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | -2.25% | 9.51% | 7.71% | 9.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCYB and CDX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.45 |
SCYB vs. CDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCYB
CDX
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
SCYB
CDX
Communication Services
SCYB
CDX
Industrials
SCYB
CDX
Healthcare
SCYB
CDX
Energy
SCYB
CDX
Financial Services
SCYB
CDX
Technology
SCYB
CDX
Real Estate
SCYB
CDX
Basic Materials
SCYB
CDX
Consumer Defensive
SCYB
CDX
Utilities
SCYB
CDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCYB vs. CDX — Risk / Return Rank
SCYB
CDX
SCYB vs. CDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCYB | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | -0.30 | +2.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | -0.39 | +3.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.95 | +0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | -0.43 | +3.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.02 | -1.02 | +15.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCYB | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | -0.30 | +2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | 0.38 | +1.33 |
Drawdowns
SCYB vs. CDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, smaller than the maximum CDX drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and CDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCYB | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -13.24% | +8.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -4.18% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -7.23% | +7.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -4.33% | +3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 1.76% | -1.22% |
Volatility
SCYB vs. CDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) is 1.08%, while Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that SCYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCYB | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 1.61% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.92% | 4.75% | -1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.74% | 5.69% | -1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 11.11% | -5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 11.11% | -5.98% |
SCYB vs. CDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCYB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CDX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCYB vs. CDX - Dividend Comparison
SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, less than CDX's 8.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | 8.35% | 7.18% | 12.60% | 5.26% | 7.51% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.92% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCYB and CDX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDX has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to SCYB (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCYB dropped -4.92% vs CDX's -13.24%.
On 1-year performance, SCYB leads with 7.67% vs -1.71% for CDX. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCYB has performed better with a 7.67% return vs -1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for CDX.
CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.35%, compared with 6.92% for SCYB.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCYB and 0.26% for CDX.
SCYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCYB and CDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer