SCUB vs. UPSD
SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) and UPSD (Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCUB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UPSD.
Performance
SCUB vs. UPSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCUB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPSD
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 18.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCUB vs. UPSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.38% |
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 17.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCUB and UPSD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCUB vs. UPSD — Risk / Return Rank
SCUB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UPSD
SCUB vs. UPSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCUB | UPSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCUB vs. UPSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCUB drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum UPSD drawdown of -23.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCUB and UPSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCUB | UPSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -23.85% | +23.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -3.76% | +3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.03% | — |
Volatility
SCUB vs. UPSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCUB | UPSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 14.27% | -13.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 20.71% | -19.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 20.71% | -19.87% |
SCUB vs. UPSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UPSD's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCUB vs. UPSD - Dividend Comparison
SCUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than UPSD's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 0.66% | 0.67% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCUB and UPSD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UPSD.
SCUB has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.66% for UPSD.
They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SCUB and 0.79% for UPSD.
Find the right allocation for SCUB and UPSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer