SCUB vs. SCEC
SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) and SCEC (Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCUB is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Sterling Capital, while SCEC is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Sterling Capital. Both are actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SCUB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SCEC.
Performance
SCUB vs. SCEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCUB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SCEC
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 2.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.34M | $2.70M | $2.62M | |
| $5.73K | $11.42K | $8.68K |
SCUB vs. SCEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.46% |
SCEC Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCUB and SCEC is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCUB vs. SCEC — Risk / Return Rank
SCUB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCEC
SCUB vs. SCEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF (SCEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCUB | SCEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCUB vs. SCEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCUB drawdown since its inception was -0.18%, smaller than the maximum SCEC drawdown of -2.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCUB and SCEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCUB | SCEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -2.98% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.21% | +2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -0.87% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.05% | — |
Volatility
SCUB vs. SCEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCUB | SCEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86% | 3.58% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.86% | 4.08% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.86% | 4.08% | -3.22% |
SCUB vs. SCEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SCEC's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCUB vs. SCEC - Dividend Comparison
SCUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than SCEC's 4.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SCEC Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF | 4.94% | 3.58% |
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.33% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCUB and SCEC have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SCEC.
SCEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 1.33% for SCUB.
SCUB is categorized as Actively Managed, while SCEC is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SCUB and 0.39% for SCEC.
Find the right allocation for SCUB and SCEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer