SCEC vs. MBS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCEC (Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF) and MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCEC returned 5.32% vs 6.88% for MBS. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCEC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MBS.

Performance

SCEC vs. MBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF (SCEC) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCEC achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than MBS's 0.62% return.

SCEC

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 5.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MBS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 6.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCEC vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCEC Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF	0.26%	4.98%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.62%	5.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SCEC and MBS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025	0.66

The correlation between SCEC and MBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCEC vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCEC

SCEC Risk / Return Rank: 42
SCEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SCEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SCEC Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SCEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SCEC Martin Ratio Rank: 39

MBS

MBS Risk / Return Rank: 69
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCEC vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF (SCEC) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCEC	MBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.36	-0.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	3.54	-1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.45	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	3.14	-1.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.06	9.89	-3.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCEC vs. MBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the MBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCEC and MBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCEC	MBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	2.36	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.60	-0.55

Drawdowns

SCEC vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCEC drawdown since its inception was -2.98%, smaller than the maximum MBS drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCEC and MBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCEC	MBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-4.09%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.80%	-2.20%	-0.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-1.46%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.79%	-1.02%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.70%	+0.18%

Volatility

SCEC vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF (SCEC) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) at 0.90%. This indicates that SCEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCEC	MBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	0.90%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.64%	2.00%	+0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	2.93%	+0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.12%	3.99%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.12%	3.99%	+0.13%

SCEC vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCEC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCEC vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison

SCEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, less than MBS's 5.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.61%	5.28%	4.52%
SCEC Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF	4.85%	3.58%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCEC and MBS in my portfolio?

SCEC and MBS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCEC or MBS?

SCEC has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to MBS (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCEC dropped -2.98% vs MBS's -4.09%.

Which ETF is better, SCEC or MBS?

On 1-year performance, MBS leads with 6.88% vs 5.32% for SCEC. On fees, SCEC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCEC or MBS?

Over the 1-year period, MBS has performed better with a 6.88% return vs 5.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCEC or MBS?

SCEC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MBS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCEC or MBS?

MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 4.85% for SCEC.

What is the main difference between SCEC and MBS?

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SCEC and 0.49% for MBS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.