SCEC vs. DBND

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SCEC (Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. SCEC is actively managed, while DBND is passively managed. Over the past year, SCEC returned 1.82% vs 1.72% for DBND. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SCEC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.

Performance

SCEC vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF (SCEC) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCEC achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.89% return.

SCEC

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.43%
• 6M: -0.91%
• YTD: -0.83%
• 1Y: 1.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.94%

DBND

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -1.01%
• 6M: -1.26%
• YTD: -0.89%
• 1Y: 1.72%
• 3Y*: 4.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	$3.03M	$2.95M	$3.32M
SCEC Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF	$2.37M	$2.63M	$2.59M

SCEC vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCEC Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF	-0.83%	4.96%
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	-0.89%	4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SCEC and DBND is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025	0.92

The correlation between SCEC and DBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCEC vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCEC

SCEC Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SCEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
SCEC Omega Ratio Rank: 27
SCEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SCEC Martin Ratio Rank: 29

DBND

DBND Risk / Return Rank: 29
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 28
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCEC vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF (SCEC) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCEC	DBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.79	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	1.15	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.14	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	0.90	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.43	2.14	+0.29

SCEC vs. DBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the DBND Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCEC and DBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCEC vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCEC drawdown since its inception was -2.98%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCEC and DBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCEC	DBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-9.39%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.80%	-2.83%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-2.46%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.87%	-2.25%	+1.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	1.19%	-0.13%

Volatility

SCEC vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF (SCEC) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 0.90%. This indicates that SCEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCEC	DBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.03%	0.90%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	2.59%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	3.24%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.08%	5.04%	-0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.08%	5.04%	-0.96%

SCEC vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCEC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCEC vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

SCEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than DBND's 4.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	4.41%	4.78%	5.19%	4.39%	2.74%
SCEC Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF	4.56%	3.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCEC and DBND in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SCEC and DBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCEC or DBND?

SCEC has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to DBND (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCEC dropped -2.98% vs DBND's -9.39%.

Which ETF is better, SCEC or DBND?

On 1-year performance, SCEC leads with 1.82% vs 1.72% for DBND. On fees, SCEC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCEC or DBND?

Over the 1-year period, SCEC has performed better with a 1.82% return vs 1.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCEC or DBND?

SCEC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCEC or DBND?

SCEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 4.41% for DBND.

What is the main difference between SCEC and DBND?

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SCEC and 0.50% for DBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.