POW vs. TCV

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and TCV (Towle Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares, while TCV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Towle. Both are actively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TCV.

Performance

POW vs. TCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and Towle Value ETF (TCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 22.51% return, which is significantly lower than TCV's 27.04% return.

POW

• 1D: -3.76%
• 1M: -20.54%
• 6M: 6.26%
• YTD: 22.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

TCV

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: 1.82%
• 6M: 15.50%
• YTD: 27.04%
• 1Y: 33.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	$2.43M	$2.30M	$3.15M
TCV Towle Value ETF	$910.76K	$643.64K	$380.38K

POW vs. TCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	22.51%	-1.70%
TCV Towle Value ETF	27.04%	-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between POW and TCV is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

POW vs. TCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TCV

TCV Risk / Return Rank: 74
TCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
TCV Omega Ratio Rank: 68
TCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
TCV Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

POW vs. TCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and Towle Value ETF (TCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POW	TCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.29	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.74	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.79	—

Drawdowns

POW vs. TCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, which is greater than TCV's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and TCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	POW	TCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.02%	-12.23%	-15.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.02%	-2.57%	-25.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.33%	-3.23%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	POW	TCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.66%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.78%	20.70%	+13.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.78%	21.07%	+12.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.78%	21.07%	+12.71%

POW vs. TCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TCV's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

POW vs. TCV - Dividend Comparison

POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than TCV's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.16%	0.19%
TCV Towle Value ETF	0.57%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POW and TCV in my portfolio?

POW and TCV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, POW or TCV?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, POW or TCV?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POW or TCV?

TCV has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.16% for POW.

What is the main difference between POW and TCV?

POW is categorized as Actively Managed, while TCV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Towle. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.85% for TCV.