PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCOW vs. SMCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCOW vs. SMCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SCOW

1D
-1.46%
1M
2.00%
YTD
6.60%
6M
5.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMCP

1D
-0.30%
1M
-25.99%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCOW vs. SMCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCOW and SMCP is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCOW vs. SMCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCOW vs. SMCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCOWSMCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

-1.43

+1.78

Drawdowns

SCOW vs. SMCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCOW drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum SMCP drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOW and SMCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCOWSMCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-27.86%

+17.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-25.99%

+24.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-5.33%

+2.13%

Volatility

SCOW vs. SMCP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCOWSMCPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

43.62%

-26.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

43.62%

-26.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

43.62%

-26.68%

SCOW vs. SMCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCOW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCOW vs. SMCP - Dividend Comparison

SCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCOW and SMCP have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCOW is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCOW is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMCP.

SCOW has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for SMCP.

SCOW tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index, while SMCP tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and AlphaMark Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SCOW and 0.90% for SMCP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCOW and SMCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer