PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCOW vs. ASCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCOW vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCOW achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 22.25% return.


SCOW

1D
-1.46%
1M
2.00%
YTD
6.60%
6M
5.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASCE

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.38%
YTD
22.25%
6M
21.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCOW vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCOW and ASCE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCOW vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCOW vs. ASCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCOWASCEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.92

-1.57

Drawdowns

SCOW vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCOW drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOW and ASCE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCOWASCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-9.22%

-0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-0.38%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-2.10%

-1.10%

Volatility

SCOW vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCOWASCEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

19.25%

-2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

19.25%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

19.25%

-2.31%

SCOW vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCOW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCOW vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

SCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than ASCE's 0.18% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCOW and ASCE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SCOW.

SCOW has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SCOW and 0.38% for ASCE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCOW and ASCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer