SCOW vs. ASCE
SCOW (Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SCOW is passively managed, while ASCE is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCOW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.
Performance
SCOW vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCOW achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 22.25% return.
SCOW
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASCE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 22.25%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCOW vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCOW Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF | 6.60% | -2.05% |
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCOW and ASCE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCOW vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCOW | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.92 | -1.57 |
Drawdowns
SCOW vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCOW drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOW and ASCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCOW | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -9.22% | -0.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.38% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -2.10% | -1.10% |
Volatility
SCOW vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCOW | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 19.25% | -2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 19.25% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 19.25% | -2.31% |
SCOW vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCOW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCOW vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison
SCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than ASCE's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 0.18% | 0.22% |
SCOW Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF | 0.27% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCOW and ASCE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SCOW.
SCOW has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SCOW and 0.38% for ASCE.
Find the right allocation for SCOW and ASCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer