PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCOW vs. RB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCOW vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCOW having a 6.60% return and RB slightly higher at 6.76%.


SCOW

1D
-1.46%
1M
2.00%
YTD
6.60%
6M
5.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RB

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.63%
YTD
6.76%
6M
8.48%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCOW vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCOW and RB is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCOW vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCOW vs. RB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCOWRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

3.15

-2.80

Drawdowns

SCOW vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCOW drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOW and RB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCOWRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-1.70%

-8.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-0.47%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-0.41%

-2.79%

Volatility

SCOW vs. RB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCOWRBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

6.21%

+10.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

6.21%

+10.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

6.21%

+10.73%

SCOW vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCOW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCOW vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

SCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than RB's 2.00% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCOW and RB have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SCOW.

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.27% for SCOW.

SCOW is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. SCOW tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index, while RB tracks Russell 2000. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SCOW and 0.58% for RB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCOW and RB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer