SCOW vs. COWG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCOW (Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF) and COWG (Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCOW is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index, while COWG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCOW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWG.

Performance

SCOW vs. COWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCOW achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than COWG's 12.50% return.

SCOW

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 6M: 5.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COWG

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 8.17%
• YTD: 12.50%
• 6M: 12.76%
• 1Y: 13.36%
• 3Y*: 24.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCOW vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCOW Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF	6.60%	-2.05%
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	12.50%	0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SCOW and COWG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

SCOW vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWG

COWG Risk / Return Rank: 24
COWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
COWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
COWG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
COWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
COWG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCOW vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCOW	COWG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	1.18	-0.84

Drawdowns

SCOW vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCOW drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum COWG drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOW and COWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCOW	COWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.09%	-23.60%	+13.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.79%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	0.00%	-1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-3.28%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCOW	COWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.94%	15.96%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.94%	19.11%	-2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	19.11%	-2.17%

SCOW vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCOW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCOW vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison

SCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than COWG's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.30%	0.32%	0.40%	0.47%
SCOW Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF	0.27%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCOW and COWG in my portfolio?

SCOW and COWG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SCOW or COWG?

On fees, COWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCOW or COWG?

COWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SCOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCOW or COWG?

COWG has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.27% for SCOW.

What is the main difference between SCOW and COWG?

SCOW is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while COWG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. SCOW tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index, while COWG tracks Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SCOW and 0.49% for COWG.