PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCOW vs. INDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCOW vs. INDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCOW having a 6.60% return and INDS slightly lower at 6.59%.


SCOW

1D
-1.46%
1M
2.00%
YTD
6.60%
6M
5.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INDS

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
6.59%
6M
5.24%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
2.57%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCOW vs. INDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCOW and INDS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCOW vs. INDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCOW

INDS
INDS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
INDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
INDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCOW vs. INDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCOW vs. INDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCOWINDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.38

-0.03

Drawdowns

SCOW vs. INDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCOW drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum INDS drawdown of -40.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOW and INDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCOWINDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-40.17%

+30.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-20.51%

+19.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-15.57%

+12.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

Volatility

SCOW vs. INDS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCOWINDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

16.23%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

20.16%

-3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

23.11%

-6.17%

SCOW vs. INDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCOW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than INDS's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCOW vs. INDS - Dividend Comparison

SCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than INDS's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
3.55%3.70%3.75%3.11%2.63%1.24%1.68%2.26%1.81%
SCOW
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
0.27%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCOW and INDS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCOW is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCOW is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for INDS.

INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.27% for SCOW.

SCOW is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while INDS is REIT. SCOW tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index, while INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SCOW and 0.60% for INDS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCOW and INDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer