PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCOW vs. FYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCOW vs. FYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCOW achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than FYX's 18.13% return.


SCOW

1D
-1.46%
1M
2.00%
YTD
6.60%
6M
5.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FYX

1D
-1.34%
1M
1.06%
YTD
18.13%
6M
18.02%
1Y
43.61%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCOW vs. FYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCOW and FYX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCOW vs. FYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCOW

FYX
FYX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCOW vs. FYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCOW vs. FYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCOWFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.36

-0.01

Drawdowns

SCOW vs. FYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCOW drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum FYX drawdown of -61.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOW and FYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCOWFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-61.80%

+51.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-1.48%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-10.89%

+7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

Volatility

SCOW vs. FYX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCOWFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

18.28%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

21.96%

-5.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

24.21%

-7.27%

SCOW vs. FYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCOW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FYX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCOW vs. FYX - Dividend Comparison

SCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than FYX's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.69%0.64%1.62%1.22%0.95%0.99%0.65%1.12%1.08%0.60%0.94%0.88%
SCOW
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
0.27%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCOW and FYX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCOW is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCOW is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.

FYX has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.27% for SCOW.

SCOW tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index, while FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SCOW and 0.63% for FYX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCOW and FYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer