SCOW vs. FYX
SCOW (Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF) and FYX (First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - SCOW tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index while FYX tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCOW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FYX.
Performance
SCOW vs. FYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCOW achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than FYX's 18.13% return.
SCOW
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 43.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
SCOW vs. FYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCOW Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF | 6.60% | -2.05% |
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 18.13% | 5.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCOW and FYX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCOW vs. FYX — Risk / Return Rank
SCOW
FYX
SCOW vs. FYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCOW | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.36 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SCOW vs. FYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCOW drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum FYX drawdown of -61.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOW and FYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCOW | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -61.80% | +51.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.48% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -10.89% | +7.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.34% | — |
Volatility
SCOW vs. FYX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCOW | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 18.28% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 21.96% | -5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 24.21% | -7.27% |
SCOW vs. FYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCOW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FYX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCOW vs. FYX - Dividend Comparison
SCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than FYX's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.69% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 1.12% | 1.08% | 0.60% | 0.94% | 0.88% |
SCOW Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF | 0.27% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCOW and FYX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCOW is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCOW is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.
FYX has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.27% for SCOW.
SCOW tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index, while FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SCOW and 0.63% for FYX.
Find the right allocation for SCOW and FYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer