PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCOW vs. AVSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCOW vs. AVSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCOW achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly lower than AVSC's 25.77% return.


SCOW

1D
0.83%
1M
5.13%
6M
10.79%
YTD
14.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVSC

1D
0.95%
1M
4.22%
6M
16.71%
YTD
25.77%
1Y
40.31%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCOW vs. AVSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCOW and AVSC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCOW vs. AVSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCOW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AVSC
AVSC Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AVSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCOW vs. AVSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCOWAVSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.14

SCOW vs. AVSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCOW vs. AVSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCOW drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum AVSC drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOW and AVSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCOWAVSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-28.40%

+18.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-7.26%

+4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

Volatility

SCOW vs. AVSC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCOWAVSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

17.71%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

22.17%

-5.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

22.17%

-5.43%

SCOW vs. AVSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCOW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than AVSC's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCOW vs. AVSC - Dividend Comparison

SCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than AVSC's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AVSC
Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF
0.91%1.16%1.17%1.42%1.10%
SCOW
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
0.37%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCOW and AVSC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVSC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVSC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SCOW.

AVSC has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.37% for SCOW.

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Avantis Investors. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SCOW and 0.25% for AVSC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCOW and AVSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer