SCO vs. UGA
SCO (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both Oil & Gas funds - SCO tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%) while UGA tracks the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCO returned -36.90%/yr vs 14.05%/yr for UGA. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. SCO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
SCO vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a -59.41% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 65.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SCO has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of -36.90%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
SCO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 27.56%
- YTD
- -59.41%
- 6M
- -60.52%
- 1Y
- -46.47%
- 3Y*
- -32.01%
- 5Y*
- -39.29%
- 10Y*
- -36.90%
UGA
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -11.04%
- YTD
- 65.71%
- 6M
- 65.60%
- 1Y
- 52.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 24.13%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
SCO vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -59.41% | 15.90% | -19.00% | -12.41% | -62.59% | -72.62% | -4.20% | -58.50% | 19.22% | -22.40% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 65.71% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCO and UGA is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008 | -0.81 |
The correlation between SCO and UGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.90 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCO vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
SCO
UGA
SCO vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.27 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 2.87 | -3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 7.80 | -9.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCO vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than UGA's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -86.59% | -13.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.24% | -18.96% | -53.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.76% | -26.68% | -52.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.80% | -38.11% | -56.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.51% | -75.89% | -23.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.73% | -17.24% | -82.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.19% | -36.70% | -48.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.61% | 6.97% | +29.64% |
Volatility
SCO vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) has a higher volatility of 16.80% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 10.31%. This indicates that SCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.80% | 10.31% | +6.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.16% | 30.57% | +16.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.03% | 35.23% | +21.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.02% | 34.45% | +25.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.92% | 37.25% | +34.67% |
SCO vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCO vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCO nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCO and UGA have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCO has higher volatility (16.80%) compared to UGA (10.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCO dropped -99.80% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.05% vs -36.90% for SCO. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 10.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.05% return vs -36.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCO.
SCO and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCO and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCO and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer